HMTC
Price
$6.23
Change
+$0.56 (+9.88%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
872K
SCABY
Price
$14.35
Change
+$2.80 (+24.24%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
9.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMTC vs SCABY

Header iconHMTC vs SCABY Comparison
Open Charts HMTC vs SCABYBanner chart's image
Homasote
Price$6.23
Change+$0.56 (+9.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization872K
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$14.35
Change+$2.80 (+24.24%)
Volume$536
Capitalization9.32B
HMTC vs SCABY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMTC vs. SCABY commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMTC is a Hold and SCABY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (HMTC: $6.23 vs. SCABY: $14.35)
Brand notoriety: HMTC and SCABY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMTC: 27% vs. SCABY: 163%
Market capitalization -- HMTC: $872K vs. SCABY: $9.32B
HMTC [@Forest Products] is valued at $872K. SCABY’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $9.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $9.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $2.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMTC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCABY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCABY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCABY is a better buy in the long-term than HMTC.

Price Growth

HMTC (@Forest Products) experienced а +9.88% price change this week, while SCABY (@Forest Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (+2.63% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCABY($9.32B) has a higher market cap than HMTC($872K). HMTC YTD gains are higher at: 33.978 vs. SCABY (29.840).
HMTCSCABYHMTC / SCABY
Capitalization872K9.32B0%
EBITDAN/A8.26B-
Gain YTD33.97829.840114%
P/E RatioN/A18.69-
RevenueN/A19.3B-
Total CashN/A222M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMTC: Fundamental Ratings
HMTC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGDAX29.46N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth A
PEQKX24.46N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Equity Income R6
HSLCX37.98N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
TBHDX6.14N/A
N/A
Tweedy, Browne Worldwide Hi Div Yld Val
JDVWX23.27N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value R6

HMTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HMTC and BSTO have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMTC and BSTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMTC
1D Price
Change %
HMTC100%
N/A
BSTO - HMTC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCABY - HMTC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JCTC - HMTC
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
WFG - HMTC
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
CFPZF - HMTC
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
More

SCABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCABY and HMTC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCABY and HMTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCABY
1D Price
Change %
SCABY100%
N/A
HMTC - SCABY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFG - SCABY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
IFSPF - SCABY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFSTF - SCABY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSD - SCABY
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.23%
More