Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMVAX vs JVMCX
HMVAX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HMVAX vs JVMCX
Hartford MidCap Value A
Price$15.87
Change-$0.07 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.72
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.93B
HMVAX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMVAX vs. JVMCX commentary
Sep 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMVAX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. HMVAX (1.15B). HMVAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: HMVAX (0.67) vs JVMCX (0.00). HMVAX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HMVAX (24 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HMVAX (1.14). HMVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMVAX: JVMCX (1000) vs HMVAX (2000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.03 vs. HMVAX (-7.15). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.92 vs. HMVAX (29.51).
| HMVAX | JVMCX | HMVAX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.85 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.86 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.640 | 9.684 | 27% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 23.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.15 | -1.03 | 692% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.95 | 18.91 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.51 | 45.92 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.18 | 46.62 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement