Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMVFX vs JVMCX
HMVFX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HMVFX vs JVMCX
Hartford MidCap Value F
Price$16.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.85B
HMVFX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMVFX vs. JVMCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMVFX is a Hold and JVMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. HMVFX (1.13B). HMVFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: HMVFX (0.98) vs JVMCX (0.00). HMVFX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HMVFX (9 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HMVFX (0.76). HMVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMVFX: JVMCX (1000) vs HMVFX (1000000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.45 vs. HMVFX (-11.96). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.87 vs. HMVFX (28.95).
| HMVFX | JVMCX | HMVFX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.85 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.86 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.901 | 8.893 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 23.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.98 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.96 | -6.45 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.56 | 21.60 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.95 | 40.87 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement