Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNCCX vs RERAX
HNCCX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts HNCCX vs RERAX
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets356.66M
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$59.62
Change-$0.13 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.84B
HNCCX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNCCX vs. RERAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNCCX is a StrongBuy and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. HNCCX (357M). RERAX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: RERAX (0.23) vs HNCCX (0.00). HNCCX was incepted earlier than RERAX: HNCCX (24 years) vs RERAX (23 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RERAX (1.57). RERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). RERAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: RERAX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.81 vs. RERAX (8.95). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.20 vs. RERAX (9.51).
| HNCCX | RERAX | HNCCX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.57 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.57 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.300 | 18.223 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.81 | 8.95 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.83 | 37.22 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.20 | 9.51 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.00 | 36.63 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers