Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNCCX vs RERAX
HNCCX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts HNCCX vs RERAX
Hartford International Growth C
Price$19.08
Change-$0.27 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.85M
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$60.82
Change-$0.33 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.4B
HNCCX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNCCX vs. RERAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNCCX is a Hold and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. HNCCX (373M). RERAX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: RERAX (0.22) vs HNCCX (0.00). HNCCX was incepted earlier than RERAX: HNCCX (24 years) vs RERAX (23 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than RERAX (1.57). RERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). RERAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: RERAX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.68 vs. RERAX (8.99). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.14 vs. RERAX (9.47).
| HNCCX | RERAX | HNCCX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.57 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.57 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.723 | 20.603 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 373M | 138B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.68 | 8.99 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.42 | 46.39 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.14 | 9.47 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.34 | 36.01 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement