Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNCSX vs RERBX
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts HNCSX vs RERBX
Hartford International Growth R4
Price$22.49
Change+$0.35 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets368.15M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$62.12
Change+$0.81 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.06B
HNCSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNCSX vs. RERBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNCSX is a Buy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. HNCSX (368M). RERBX pays higher dividends than HNCSX: RERBX (0.24) vs HNCSX (0.07). HNCSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: HNCSX (19 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than HNCSX (1.31). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCSX (31.00). HNCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: HNCSX (0) vs RERBX (250). HNCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.08 vs. RERBX (10.61). HNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.96 vs. RERBX (10.61).
| HNCSX | RERBX | HNCSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.56 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.56 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.867 | 22.163 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 368M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.24 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.08 | 10.61 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.85 | 47.01 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.96 | 10.61 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.04 | 35.46 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement