Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNMDX vs JVMCX
HNMDX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HNMDX vs JVMCX
Heartland Mid Cap Value Institutional
Price$13.29
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.87M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$25.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.45B
HNMDX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNMDX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNMDX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. HNMDX (567M). HNMDX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: HNMDX (1.08) vs JVMCX (0.00). HNMDX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HNMDX (11 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than HNMDX (0.99). HNMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNMDX: JVMCX (1000) vs HNMDX (500000). HNMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.66 vs. JVMCX (-5.12). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.34 vs. HNMDX (24.60).
| HNMDX | JVMCX | HNMDX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.87 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.88 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.625 | 1.858 | -87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 21.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.66 | -5.12 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.99 | 2.56 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.60 | 33.34 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.52 | 25.97 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement