HOEGF
Price
$9.22
Change
-$0.67 (-6.77%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.75B
MPZZF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.07 (-4.19%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
716.75M
Ad is loading...

HOEGF vs MPZZF

Header iconHOEGF vs MPZZF Comparison
Open Charts HOEGF vs MPZZFBanner chart's image
HOEGH AUTOLINER ASA
Price$9.22
Change-$0.67 (-6.77%)
Volume$16.69K
Capitalization1.75B
MPC Container Ships AS
Price$1.60
Change-$0.07 (-4.19%)
Volume$106.3K
Capitalization716.75M
HOEGF vs MPZZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HOEGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HOEGF vs. MPZZF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOEGF is a Hold and MPZZF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HOEGF: $9.23 vs. MPZZF: $1.60)
Brand notoriety: HOEGF and MPZZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOEGF: 67% vs. MPZZF: 123%
Market capitalization -- HOEGF: $1.75B vs. MPZZF: $716.75M
HOEGF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.75B. MPZZF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $716.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOEGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMPZZF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HOEGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MPZZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPZZF is a better buy in the long-term than HOEGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOEGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPZZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOEGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MPZZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOEGF is a better buy in the short-term than MPZZF.

Price Growth

HOEGF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -10.15% price change this week, while MPZZF (@Marine Shipping) price change was -6.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.26% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOEGF($1.75B) has a higher market cap than MPZZF($717M). MPZZF has higher P/E ratio than HOEGF: MPZZF (2.96) vs HOEGF (2.62). HOEGF YTD gains are higher at: -7.750 vs. MPZZF (-13.514). HOEGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 799M vs. MPZZF (330M). HOEGF has more cash in the bank: 344M vs. MPZZF (135M). MPZZF has less debt than HOEGF: MPZZF (202M) vs HOEGF (599M). HOEGF has higher revenues than MPZZF: HOEGF (1.4B) vs MPZZF (563M).
HOEGFMPZZFHOEGF / MPZZF
Capitalization1.75B717M244%
EBITDA799M330M242%
Gain YTD-7.750-13.51457%
P/E Ratio2.622.9688%
Revenue1.4B563M249%
Total Cash344M135M255%
Total Debt599M202M297%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MPZZF: Fundamental Ratings
MPZZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOEGFMPZZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HOEGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MPZZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AHCHY13.680.52
+3.95%
Anhui Conch Cement Co., Ltd.
CYDY0.15N/A
+1.31%
CytoDyn Inc.
DNPLY7.230.03
+0.42%
Dai Nippon Printing Co. Ltd.
PHRRF0.15N/A
-0.73%
PharmaTher Holdings Ltd.
CMPGY32.56-0.35
-1.08%
Compass Group Plc

HOEGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOEGF has been loosely correlated with WAWIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HOEGF jumps, then WAWIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOEGF
1D Price
Change %
HOEGF100%
-6.82%
WAWIF - HOEGF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
ECO - HOEGF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
HAFN - HOEGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.24%
BWLP - HOEGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.59%
MPZZF - HOEGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.19%
More

MPZZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPZZF has been loosely correlated with HPGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPZZF jumps, then HPGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPZZF
1D Price
Change %
MPZZF100%
-4.19%
HPGLY - MPZZF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMKBY - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
SBLK - MPZZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
HAFN - MPZZF
35%
Loosely correlated
-5.24%
HLAGF - MPZZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.77%
More