Ad is loading...
HOOCX vs NAESX
HOOCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HOOCX vs NAESX
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps C
Price$25.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.69M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.00
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
HOOCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HOOCX vs. NAESX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOOCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. HOOCX (193M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HOOCX: NAESX (1.43) vs HOOCX (0.00). HOOCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HOOCX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HOOCX (2.16) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HOOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). HOOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HOOCX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. HOOCX (-8.31). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 67.63 vs. HOOCX (27.24).
| HOOCX | NAESX | HOOCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.17 | 1,235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 0.17 | 1,271% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.209 | -6.997 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 193M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.31 | 0.34 | -2,411% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.23 | 22.70 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.24 | 67.63 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.04 | - |