HOOD
Price
$131.84
Change
-$3.96 (-2.92%)
Updated
Oct 21 closing price
Capitalization
117.16B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MATH
Price
$2.86
Change
-$0.12 (-4.03%)
Updated
Oct 21 closing price
Capitalization
112.97M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HOOD vs MATH

Header iconHOOD vs MATH Comparison
Open Charts HOOD vs MATHBanner chart's image
Robinhood Markets
Price$131.84
Change-$3.96 (-2.92%)
Volume$19.5M
Capitalization117.16B
Metalpha Technology Holding
Price$2.86
Change-$0.12 (-4.03%)
Volume$36.53K
Capitalization112.97M
HOOD vs MATH Comparison Chart in %
HOOD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HOOD vs. MATH commentary
Oct 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOOD is a Hold and MATH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 22, 2025
Stock price -- (HOOD: $131.84 vs. MATH: $2.86)
Brand notoriety: HOOD and MATH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOOD: 48% vs. MATH: 21%
Market capitalization -- HOOD: $117.16B vs. MATH: $112.97M
HOOD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $117.16B. MATH’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $112.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOOD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMATH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HOOD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MATH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOOD is a better buy in the long-term than MATH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOOD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MATH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOOD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MATH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MATH is a better buy in the short-term than HOOD.

Price Growth

HOOD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.30% price change this week, while MATH (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

HOOD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.59% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOOD($117B) has a higher market cap than MATH($113M). HOOD has higher P/E ratio than MATH: HOOD (66.92) vs MATH (7.27). HOOD YTD gains are higher at: 253.838 vs. MATH (148.696).
HOODMATHHOOD / MATH
Capitalization117B113M103,540%
EBITDA1.6BN/A-
Gain YTD253.838148.696171%
P/E Ratio66.927.27921%
Revenue3.57BN/A-
Total Cash13.5BN/A-
Total Debt12.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MATH: Fundamental Ratings
MATH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
71
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOODMATH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HOOD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MATH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLTP23.270.10
+0.41%
Amplify Bloomberg U.S.Trs 12% Prm IncETF
BUFF49.100.08
+0.16%
Innovator Laddered Allc Pwr Bfr ETF™
EMB96.280.12
+0.12%
iShares JP Morgan USD Em Mkts Bd ETF
RISR35.97N/A
N/A
FolioBeyond Alt Inc and Int Rt Hdg ETF
RINC22.20N/A
N/A
AXS Real Estate Income ETF

MATH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MATH and HIVE have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MATH and HIVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MATH
1D Price
Change %
MATH100%
-4.03%
HIVE - MATH
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
ARBK - MATH
26%
Poorly correlated
-14.78%
COIN - MATH
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
BTBT - MATH
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.29%
HOOD - MATH
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
More