HOYFF
Price
$35.40
Change
-$1.08 (-2.96%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.7B
TCLAF
Price
$14.53
Change
+$0.04 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HOYFF vs TCLAF

Header iconHOYFF vs TCLAF Comparison
Open Charts HOYFF vs TCLAFBanner chart's image
Huhtamaki Oy
Price$35.40
Change-$1.08 (-2.96%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.7B
Transcontinental
Price$14.53
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
Volume$2.62K
Capitalization1.23B
HOYFF vs TCLAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HOYFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HOYFF vs. TCLAF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HOYFF is a Hold and TCLAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HOYFF: $35.40 vs. TCLAF: $14.53)
Brand notoriety: HOYFF and TCLAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HOYFF: 14% vs. TCLAF: 34%
Market capitalization -- HOYFF: $3.7B vs. TCLAF: $1.23B
HOYFF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $3.7B. TCLAF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HOYFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCLAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HOYFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCLAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOYFF is a better buy in the long-term than TCLAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HOYFF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCLAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HOYFF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TCLAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOYFF is a better buy in the short-term than TCLAF.

Price Growth

HOYFF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCLAF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+2.82% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOYFF($3.7B) has a higher market cap than TCLAF($1.23B). HOYFF has higher P/E ratio than TCLAF: HOYFF (16.01) vs TCLAF (9.39). TCLAF YTD gains are higher at: 24.140 vs. HOYFF (-9.567). HOYFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 633M vs. TCLAF (498M). HOYFF has more cash in the bank: 444M vs. TCLAF (43.2M). TCLAF has less debt than HOYFF: TCLAF (843M) vs HOYFF (1.77B). HOYFF has higher revenues than TCLAF: HOYFF (4.09B) vs TCLAF (2.78B).
HOYFFTCLAFHOYFF / TCLAF
Capitalization3.7B1.23B302%
EBITDA633M498M127%
Gain YTD-9.56724.140-40%
P/E Ratio16.019.39170%
Revenue4.09B2.78B147%
Total Cash444M43.2M1,028%
Total Debt1.77B843M210%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HOYFF vs TCLAF: Fundamental Ratings
HOYFF
TCLAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4524
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
6771
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4191
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TCLAF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as HOYFF (32). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to HOYFF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as HOYFF (100). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to HOYFF’s over the last 12 months.

HOYFF's SMR Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as TCLAF (71). This means that HOYFF’s stock grew similarly to TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TCLAF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as HOYFF (75). This means that TCLAF’s stock grew similarly to HOYFF’s over the last 12 months.

HOYFF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCLAF (91). This means that HOYFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HOYFFTCLAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HOYFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCLAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISPVX20.730.14
+0.68%
Macquarie Smid Cap Core Fund R6
HISIX10.900.01
+0.09%
Homestead International Equity
MGGPX37.12N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp A
ERIFX12.60N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Balanced R
GSINX22.54N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps Inv

HOYFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HOYFF and TCLAF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOYFF and TCLAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOYFF
1D Price
Change %
HOYFF100%
N/A
TCLAF - HOYFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRVWF - HOYFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HXGCF - HOYFF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJSF - HOYFF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFLXF - HOYFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TCLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TCLAF and SEE have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TCLAF and SEE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCLAF
1D Price
Change %
TCLAF100%
N/A
SEE - TCLAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
OI - TCLAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
HOYFF - TCLAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUMXF - TCLAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - TCLAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More