HP
Price
$20.20
Change
-$0.61 (-2.93%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.01B
65 days until earnings call
NBR
Price
$38.41
Change
+$0.63 (+1.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
559.85M
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HP vs NBR

Header iconHP vs NBR Comparison
Open Charts HP vs NBRBanner chart's image
Helmerich & Payne
Price$20.20
Change-$0.61 (-2.93%)
Volume$1.4M
Capitalization2.01B
Nabors Industries
Price$38.41
Change+$0.63 (+1.67%)
Volume$449.65K
Capitalization559.85M
HP vs NBR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HP vs. NBR commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HP is a Buy and NBR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (HP: $20.20 vs. NBR: $38.41)
Brand notoriety: HP and NBR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Contract Drilling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HP: 67% vs. NBR: 89%
Market capitalization -- HP: $2.01B vs. NBR: $559.85M
HP [@Contract Drilling] is valued at $2.01B. NBR’s [@Contract Drilling] market capitalization is $559.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Contract Drilling] industry ranges from $4.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Contract Drilling] industry is $1.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNBR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HP is a better buy in the long-term than NBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NBR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NBR is a better buy in the short-term than HP.

Price Growth

HP (@Contract Drilling) experienced а -3.30% price change this week, while NBR (@Contract Drilling) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

HP is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

NBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Contract Drilling (-0.17% weekly)

The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HP($2.01B) has a higher market cap than NBR($560M). NBR YTD gains are higher at: -32.814 vs. HP (-34.580). NBR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 917M vs. HP (737M). NBR has more cash in the bank: 387M vs. HP (187M). HP has less debt than NBR: HP (2.19B) vs NBR (2.69B). HP has higher revenues than NBR: HP (3.43B) vs NBR (3.03B).
HPNBRHP / NBR
Capitalization2.01B560M359%
EBITDA737M917M80%
Gain YTD-34.580-32.814105%
P/E Ratio7.04N/A-
Revenue3.43B3.03B113%
Total Cash187M387M48%
Total Debt2.19B2.69B82%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HP vs NBR: Fundamental Ratings
HP
NBR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87100
SMR RATING
1..100
9197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HP's Valuation (35) in the Contract Drilling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NBR (76). This means that HP’s stock grew somewhat faster than NBR’s over the last 12 months.

HP's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as NBR (100). This means that HP’s stock grew similarly to NBR’s over the last 12 months.

HP's SMR Rating (91) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as NBR (97). This means that HP’s stock grew similarly to NBR’s over the last 12 months.

HP's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as NBR (51). This means that HP’s stock grew similarly to NBR’s over the last 12 months.

HP's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as NBR (100). This means that HP’s stock grew similarly to NBR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HPNBR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLMNX29.140.28
+0.97%
Harding Loevner International Eq Inv
SMLKX21.490.07
+0.33%
Shelton S&P Smallcap Index K
PEEAX15.300.04
+0.26%
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth A
ETHSX12.94N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci A
MUXYX28.56-0.09
-0.31%
Victory S&P 500 Index Y

NBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBR has been closely correlated with HP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NBR jumps, then HP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NBR
1D Price
Change %
NBR100%
+1.67%
HP - NBR
77%
Closely correlated
-2.93%
PTEN - NBR
77%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
PDS - NBR
75%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
NE - NBR
75%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
SDRL - NBR
74%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
More