HPGLY
Price
$82.50
Change
-$4.01 (-4.64%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
28.99B
MSLOF
Price
$32.60
Change
-$5.05 (-13.41%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
11.88B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HPGLY vs MSLOF

Header iconHPGLY vs MSLOF Comparison
Open Charts HPGLY vs MSLOFBanner chart's image
Hapag-Llyod AG
Price$82.50
Change-$4.01 (-4.64%)
Volume$222
Capitalization28.99B
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines
Price$32.60
Change-$5.05 (-13.41%)
Volume$100
Capitalization11.88B
HPGLY vs MSLOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HPGLY vs. MSLOF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HPGLY is a Hold and MSLOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HPGLY: $82.50 vs. MSLOF: $32.60)
Brand notoriety: HPGLY and MSLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HPGLY: 37% vs. MSLOF: 66%
Market capitalization -- HPGLY: $28.99B vs. MSLOF: $11.88B
HPGLY [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $28.99B. MSLOF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $11.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HPGLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSLOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HPGLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSLOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSLOF is a better buy in the long-term than HPGLY.

Price Growth

HPGLY (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while MSLOF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.71% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HPGLY($29B) has a higher market cap than MSLOF($11.9B). HPGLY has higher P/E ratio than MSLOF: HPGLY (10.03) vs MSLOF (3.95). HPGLY YTD gains are higher at: 12.813 vs. MSLOF (-6.857). MSLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 505B vs. HPGLY (5.17B). MSLOF has higher revenues than HPGLY: MSLOF (1.74T) vs HPGLY (19.9B).
HPGLYMSLOFHPGLY / MSLOF
Capitalization29B11.9B244%
EBITDA5.17B505B1%
Gain YTD12.813-6.857-187%
P/E Ratio10.033.95254%
Revenue19.9B1.74T1%
Total CashN/A148B-
Total DebtN/A1.37T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HPGLY vs MSLOF: Fundamental Ratings
HPGLY
MSLOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2746
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7948
SMR RATING
1..100
598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9792
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSLOF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as HPGLY (16). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to HPGLY’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as HPGLY (79). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to HPGLY’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPGLY (59). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPGLY’s over the last 12 months.

HPGLY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MSLOF (60). This means that HPGLY’s stock grew similarly to MSLOF’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as HPGLY (97). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to HPGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MPSIX21.35N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index Inst
MSAUX22.23N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp A
AEDAX35.93N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV European Equity A
VTSAX142.15N/A
N/A
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
FSAAX16.11N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% A

HPGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HPGLY has been loosely correlated with HLAGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HPGLY jumps, then HLAGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HPGLY
1D Price
Change %
HPGLY100%
N/A
HLAGF - HPGLY
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMKBY - HPGLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.85%
ZIM - HPGLY
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.33%
MPZZF - HPGLY
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
CICOY - HPGLY
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
More

MSLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSLOF and HPGLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSLOF and HPGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSLOF
1D Price
Change %
MSLOF100%
N/A
HPGLY - MSLOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAKKF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLAGF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - MSLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.08%
MPZZF - MSLOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
More