HPGLY
Price
$73.37
Change
-$2.17 (-2.87%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
26.07B
MSLOF
Price
$32.63
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
11.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HPGLY vs MSLOF

Header iconHPGLY vs MSLOF Comparison
Open Charts HPGLY vs MSLOFBanner chart's image
Hapag-Llyod AG
Price$73.37
Change-$2.17 (-2.87%)
Volume$737
Capitalization26.07B
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines
Price$32.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization11.27B
HPGLY vs MSLOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HPGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HPGLY vs. MSLOF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HPGLY is a StrongBuy and MSLOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (HPGLY: $73.37 vs. MSLOF: $32.63)
Brand notoriety: HPGLY and MSLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HPGLY: 79% vs. MSLOF: 104%
Market capitalization -- HPGLY: $26.07B vs. MSLOF: $11.2B
HPGLY [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $26.07B. MSLOF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $11.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HPGLY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSLOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HPGLY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSLOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSLOF is a better buy in the long-term than HPGLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HPGLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSLOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HPGLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSLOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSLOF is a better buy in the short-term than HPGLY.

Price Growth

HPGLY (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -2.87% price change this week, while MSLOF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+2.09% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HPGLY($26.1B) has a higher market cap than MSLOF($11.3B). HPGLY has higher P/E ratio than MSLOF: HPGLY (9.36) vs MSLOF (4.04). HPGLY YTD gains are higher at: 0.329 vs. MSLOF (-6.771). MSLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 505B vs. HPGLY (5.17B). MSLOF has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. HPGLY (7.73B). HPGLY has less debt than MSLOF: HPGLY (6.46B) vs MSLOF (1.37T). MSLOF has higher revenues than HPGLY: MSLOF (1.74T) vs HPGLY (19.9B).
HPGLYMSLOFHPGLY / MSLOF
Capitalization26.1B11.3B231%
EBITDA5.17B505B1%
Gain YTD0.329-6.771-5%
P/E Ratio9.364.04231%
Revenue19.9B1.74T1%
Total Cash7.73B148B5%
Total Debt6.46B1.37T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HPGLY vs MSLOF: Fundamental Ratings
HPGLY
MSLOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2648
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8849
SMR RATING
1..100
6010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9684
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSLOF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as HPGLY (13). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to HPGLY’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPGLY (88). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPGLY’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPGLY (60). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPGLY’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HPGLY (57). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to HPGLY’s over the last 12 months.

MSLOF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as HPGLY (96). This means that MSLOF’s stock grew similarly to HPGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HPGLYMSLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HPGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QLV69.240.28
+0.40%
FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF
EEMV62.760.07
+0.11%
iShares MSCI Emerg Mkts Min Vol Fctr ETF
IBHE23.17N/A
+0.02%
iShares iBonds 2025 Term HY and Inc ETF
MINN21.74N/A
N/A
Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bd ETF
PRIV25.16-0.02
-0.10%
SPDR SSGA Apollo IG Public & Private Credit ETF

HPGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HPGLY has been loosely correlated with HLAGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HPGLY jumps, then HLAGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HPGLY
1D Price
Change %
HPGLY100%
N/A
HLAGF - HPGLY
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMKBY - HPGLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
ZIM - HPGLY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MPZZF - HPGLY
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
CICOY - HPGLY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More

MSLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSLOF and HPGLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSLOF and HPGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSLOF
1D Price
Change %
MSLOF100%
N/A
HPGLY - MSLOF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAKKF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLAGF - MSLOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - MSLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
MPZZF - MSLOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.18%
More