Advertisement
HPQ vs NTAP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? HP Inc. (HPQ) vs. NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HPQ reported record fiscal Q3 2026 revenue of $15.7 billion, up 12.5% year-over-year, with raised full-year guidance amid AI PC initiatives.
- NTAP has delivered stronger year-to-date total return of approximately 77% compared to HPQ’s roughly 41% through late August 2026.
- HPQ operates primarily in personal computing and printing, while NTAP focuses on enterprise data storage and cloud infrastructure with AI data management exposure.
- Recent market activity shows HPQ trading near $30.52 with volatility tied to PC shipment data and earnings reactions, versus NTAP near $187 amid broader storage demand.
- NTAP exhibits higher valuation multiples reflective of growth in intelligent data infrastructure, while HPQ offers a dividend yield near 3.9%.
- Sector positioning favors NTAP in AI-driven data growth trends, contrasting HPQ’s hybrid work and consumer hardware cycles.
Introduction
Investors and traders evaluating technology hardware and infrastructure names often compare HPQ and NTAP to assess relative positioning in personal computing versus enterprise storage. Both companies operate in the broader technology sector yet serve distinct end markets, with HPQ centered on PCs and printing and NTAP on data management solutions. This comparison appeals to those seeking insights into recent performance differentials, valuation contrasts, and exposure to AI-related demand. Market participants monitoring momentum, earnings catalysts, and sector rotation may find the analysis relevant for portfolio allocation decisions within information technology.
HPQ Overview and Recent Performance
HP Inc. (HPQ) develops personal computers, printers, and related technologies for consumers and enterprises. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $30.52 following fiscal third-quarter 2026 results that showed record revenue of $15.7 billion, a 12.5% year-over-year increase. The company raised its full-year non-GAAP EPS outlook to $3.19–$3.29 while targeting a 50% AI PC mix by year-end. Price behavior reflected mixed reactions, including sessions of gains and pullbacks linked to PC shipment trends and earnings details. Sentiment has been influenced by hybrid work demand alongside cost management efforts amid broader technology sector movements.
NTAP Overview and Recent Performance
NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) provides intelligent data infrastructure, including storage hardware, software, and cloud services. The stock has recently traded near $187.02, contributing to year-to-date total returns near 77%. Recent performance benefited from sustained interest in enterprise data management and AI workloads, with the company reporting solid fiscal results earlier in the period. Price action showed resilience within a 52-week range extending to $209.06, though subject to typical volatility in the storage segment. Market sentiment has been shaped by multi-cloud adoption and data growth trends supporting the company’s positioning.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. The platform features bots with varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, allowing users to explore options suited to different risk tolerances and objectives. Available data often includes ranges of historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics that help illustrate bot characteristics. This resource supports informed exploration of automated trading approaches. Visit Trending AI Robots to review current selections.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HPQ and NTAP differ markedly in business models: the former emphasizes consumer and commercial hardware with printing services, while the latter specializes in enterprise storage and data management software. Growth drivers for HPQ include AI-enabled PCs and hybrid work solutions, whereas NTAP benefits from cloud integration and AI data infrastructure demand. Recent momentum has favored NTAP with superior year-to-date returns amid storage sector strength. Risk factors include HPQ’s sensitivity to PC cycle fluctuations and NTAP’s exposure to higher valuation multiples. Sector exposure positions NTAP more directly in data-centric AI trends, while market sentiment reflects contrasting responses to earnings and macroeconomic conditions.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models indicate a probabilistic preference for NTAP. The stock’s stronger year-to-date performance and alignment with AI-driven data infrastructure demand contribute to this assessment, alongside more stable momentum signals compared to HPQ’s hardware-cycle influences. Outcomes remain subject to evolving catalysts and broader market dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HPQ is a Buy and NTAP is a Hold.
| HPQ | NTAP | HPQ / NTAP | |
| Capitalization | 32B | 39.1B | 82% |
| EBITDA | 4.21B | 2.12B | 198% |
| Gain YTD | 65.392 | 88.523 | 74% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.54 | 28.15 | 48% |
| Revenue | 59.2B | 7.39B | 801% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 3.58B | - |
| Total Debt | 10.3B | 2.53B | 406% |
HPQ | NTAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HPQ's Valuation (29) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTAP (77) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTAP’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPQ (62) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's SMR Rating (13) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPQ (46) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
HPQ's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTAP (38) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTAP’s over the last 12 months.
HPQ's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as NTAP (21) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew similarly to NTAP’s over the last 12 months.
| HPQ | NTAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 53% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HPQ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while NTAP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- HPQ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- NTAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HPQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTAP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HPQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NTAP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HPQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +9.76% price change this week, while NTAP (@Computer Communications) price change was +7.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -3.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.98%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
HPQ is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
NTAP is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-3.63% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
@Computer Communications (-3.13% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
HPQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HPQ has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HPQ jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HPQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPQ | 100% | +8.40% | ||
| NTAP - HPQ | 65% Loosely correlated | +8.54% | ||
| DELL - HPQ | 46% Loosely correlated | +11.98% | ||
| CRSR - HPQ | 36% Loosely correlated | +7.72% | ||
| RGTI - HPQ | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CRCT - HPQ | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.93% | ||
More | ||||