Advertisement
HPQ vs NTAP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? HP Inc. (HPQ) vs. NetApp, Inc. (NTAP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HPQ and NTAP both posted double-digit gains in recent market activity amid broader technology sector strength tied to artificial intelligence themes.
- HPQ has benefited from heightened demand for AI-enabled personal computers, with the stock rising approximately 27% over the past month ahead of its fiscal Q2 earnings release.
- NTAP has delivered stronger year-to-date and one-year returns, supported by momentum in hybrid cloud and data storage solutions for AI workloads.
- Both companies face upcoming earnings reports in late May 2026, with investor focus on guidance related to AI-driven growth and margin performance.
- HPQ operates primarily in consumer and commercial computing hardware, while NTAP specializes in enterprise data management and storage, creating distinct sector exposures.
- Relative momentum favors NTAP on longer-term metrics, though HPQ shows notable short-term volatility and analyst target revisions.
Introduction
This comparison examines HPQ and NTAP to highlight differences in business models, recent price behavior, and market positioning within the technology sector. Both stocks have attracted attention due to their connections to artificial intelligence trends, yet they serve different segments of the market. Investors and traders focused on hardware versus data infrastructure may find this analysis relevant when evaluating relative performance and risk profiles in the current environment. The review draws on observable market data and developments from recent weeks to provide a factual basis for comparison.
HPQ Overview and Recent Performance
HP Inc. designs and manufactures personal computers, printers, and related solutions for consumer and enterprise markets. In recent market activity, HPQ shares experienced a significant rally, closing at $25.24 on May 22, 2026, for a gain of 15.25%. This move contributed to a roughly 27% increase over the prior month, driven by optimism surrounding demand for AI-enabled PCs and positive analyst commentary. The company is scheduled to report fiscal second-quarter results on May 27, 2026, with expectations centered on revenue around $14.05 billion and non-GAAP EPS in the $0.70 to $0.76 range. Sentiment has been supported by analyst price target increases and positioning ahead of the earnings event.
NTAP Overview and Recent Performance
NetApp, Inc. provides data management and storage solutions, with a focus on hybrid cloud environments and enterprise infrastructure. In recent market activity, NTAP shares advanced to a close of $139.36 on May 22, 2026, representing a 12.44% gain. The stock has shown robust longer-term results, including a year-to-date return of approximately 31.44% and a one-year return near 42.37%. Growth has been linked to demand for AI-optimized storage and cloud services. The company has an upcoming earnings release expected around late May 2026, with attention on continued expansion in its core segments.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing environments are featured in this section. Available bots span a wide range of statistics, including differing win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles across multiple trading styles. This resource offers traders access to diverse automated approaches. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
HPQ operates in the consumer and commercial computing hardware space with exposure to personal systems and printing, while NTAP focuses on enterprise data storage and hybrid cloud solutions. This creates contrasting growth drivers: HPQ tied to PC refresh cycles and AI PC adoption, versus NTAP linked to data infrastructure demands from AI workloads. Recent momentum shows both stocks advancing sharply in the same session, yet NTAP maintains superior longer-term returns. Risk factors differ, with HPQ potentially more sensitive to consumer spending and hardware cycles, and NTAP exposed to enterprise IT budgets. Market sentiment reflects broad technology enthusiasm, though relative positioning highlights NTAP’s stronger historical outperformance alongside HPQ’s near-term volatility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative returns over multiple timeframes, and positioning within AI-related infrastructure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to NTAP. Its stronger year-to-date and one-year performance, combined with sustained momentum in data storage for cloud and AI applications, provides a more consistent profile compared with HPQ’s shorter-term surge ahead of earnings. This assessment remains probabilistic and reflects recent market data rather than forward projections.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HPQ is a Hold and NTAP is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HPQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTAP’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- HPQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NTAP’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HPQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HPQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NTAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HPQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -4.31% price change this week, while NTAP (@Computer Communications) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.87%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
HPQ is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.
NTAP is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (+0.70% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
@Computer Communications (-1.88% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| HPQ | NTAP | HPQ / NTAP | |
| Capitalization | 21.5B | 31B | 69% |
| EBITDA | 4.12B | 1.96B | 211% |
| Gain YTD | 8.677 | 49.311 | 18% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.72 | 24.93 | 35% |
| Revenue | 57.4B | 6.93B | 829% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 3.58B | - |
| Total Debt | 10.9B | 2.73B | 399% |
HPQ | NTAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 4 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 35 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTAP's Valuation (74) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as HPQ (80) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Computer Peripherals industry is significantly better than the same rating for HPQ (100) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew significantly faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's SMR Rating (12) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as HPQ (44) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as HPQ (22) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as HPQ (56) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
| HPQ | NTAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 9 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 58% | 7 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 59% |
Advertisement
HPQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HPQ has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HPQ jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HPQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPQ | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| NTAP - HPQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| LOGI - HPQ | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| DELL - HPQ | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| CRSR - HPQ | 37% Loosely correlated | +3.24% | ||
| SSYS - HPQ | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.25% | ||
More | ||||
NTAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTAP has been closely correlated with DELL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTAP jumps, then DELL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTAP | 100% | -0.88% | ||
| DELL - NTAP | 68% Closely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| HPQ - NTAP | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| WDC - NTAP | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| LOGI - NTAP | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| STX - NTAP | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
More | ||||