Advertisement
HPQ vs NTAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HPQ is a Hold and NTAP is a StrongBuy.
HPQ | NTAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 44 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 8 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 41 | 17 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HPQ's Valuation (22) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTAP (82) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTAP’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPQ (71) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's SMR Rating (13) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as HPQ (45) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as HPQ (21) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as HPQ (22) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
| HPQ | NTAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 59% | 23 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HPQ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while NTAP’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- HPQ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- NTAP’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HPQ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTAP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HPQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NTAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HPQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +3.24% price change this week, while NTAP (@Computer Communications) price change was +9.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.93%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
HPQ is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
NTAP is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-0.39% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
@Computer Communications (-1.83% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
HPQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HPQ has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HPQ jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HPQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPQ | 100% | +2.78% | ||
| NTAP - HPQ | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| DELL - HPQ | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| CRSR - HPQ | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| P - HPQ | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
| RGTI - HPQ | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||
NTAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTAP has been closely correlated with DELL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTAP jumps, then DELL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTAP | 100% | +2.37% | ||
| DELL - NTAP | 68% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| HPQ - NTAP | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| WDC - NTAP | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| LOGI - NTAP | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| STX - NTAP | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.52% | ||
More | ||||