HPTO
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
853.93K
PAYD
Price
$2.60
Change
-$0.10 (-3.70%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
21.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HPTO vs PAYD

Header iconHPTO vs PAYD Comparison
Open Charts HPTO vs PAYDBanner chart's image
hopTo
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$541
Capitalization853.93K
Paid
Price$2.60
Change-$0.10 (-3.70%)
Volume$521
Capitalization21.16M
HPTO vs PAYD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HPTO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAYD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HPTO vs. PAYD commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HPTO is a Buy and PAYD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (HPTO: $0.05 vs. PAYD: $2.60)
Brand notoriety: HPTO and PAYD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HPTO: 246% vs. PAYD: 22%
Market capitalization -- HPTO: $853.93K vs. PAYD: $21.16M
HPTO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $853.93K. PAYD’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $21.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $324.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HPTO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAYD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HPTO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAYD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HPTO and PAYD are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HPTO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAYD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HPTO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PAYD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HPTO is a better buy in the short-term than PAYD.

Price Growth

HPTO (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PAYD (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.47% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAYD($21.2M) has a higher market cap than HPTO($854K). PAYD has higher P/E ratio than HPTO: PAYD (86.67) vs HPTO (2.88). HPTO YTD gains are higher at: -10.000 vs. PAYD (-13.333).
HPTOPAYDHPTO / PAYD
Capitalization854K21.2M4%
EBITDAN/A-301.39K-
Gain YTD-10.000-13.33375%
P/E Ratio2.8886.673%
RevenueN/A18.8M-
Total CashN/A751K-
Total DebtN/A111K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HPTO vs PAYD: Fundamental Ratings
HPTO
PAYD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2727
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HPTO's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAYD (72). This means that HPTO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAYD’s over the last 12 months.

HPTO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PAYD (100). This means that HPTO’s stock grew similarly to PAYD’s over the last 12 months.

PAYD's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as HPTO (89). This means that PAYD’s stock grew similarly to HPTO’s over the last 12 months.

PAYD's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as HPTO (50). This means that PAYD’s stock grew similarly to HPTO’s over the last 12 months.

PAYD's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HPTO (100). This means that PAYD’s stock grew significantly faster than HPTO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HPTOPAYD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HPTO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAYD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBANL25.690.12
+0.47%
Huntington Bancshares
CPB32.510.11
+0.34%
The Campbell's Company
ZIP4.34-0.07
-1.59%
ZipRecruiter
GEG2.12-0.04
-1.85%
Great Elm Group
FIHL16.28-0.83
-4.85%
Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited

HPTO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HPTO and PSHPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HPTO and PSHPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HPTO
1D Price
Change %
HPTO100%
N/A
PSHPF - HPTO
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPNAF - HPTO
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMNSF - HPTO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAYD - HPTO
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGGEF - HPTO
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PAYD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PAYD and OBIIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAYD and OBIIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAYD
1D Price
Change %
PAYD100%
N/A
OBIIF - PAYD
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTRRF - PAYD
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPTO - PAYD
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLGGF - PAYD
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGGGF - PAYD
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More