Ad is loading...
HQGO vs IVW
HQGO vs IVW Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IVW
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$48.54
Change+$1.01 (+2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.66M
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Price$94.11
Change+$1.30 (+1.40%)
Volume$1.14M
Net Assets50.65B
HQGO vs IVW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IVW commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Buy and IVW is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 50.7B vs. HQGO (44.7M). IVW has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IVW (-7.203) vs HQGO (-14.781). HQGO was incepted earlier than IVW: HQGO (1 year) vs IVW (25 years). IVW (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34). IVW has a higher turnover HQGO (17.00) vs HQGO (17.00).
| HQGO | IVW | HQGO / IVW | |
| Gain YTD | -14.781 | -7.203 | 205% |
| Net Assets | 44.7M | 50.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.18 | 189% |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 31.00 | 55% |
| Yield | 0.54 | 0.50 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IVW | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| MSFT - HQGO | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| ADSK - HQGO | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| NXPI - HQGO | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
More | ||||
IVW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| LRCX - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CDNS - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| SNPS - IVW | 77% Closely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| META - IVW | 75% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| KLAC - IVW | 75% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||