Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IWF
HQGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IWF
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$58.08
Change-$1.12 (-1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.85M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$464.27
Change+$3.41 (+0.74%)
Volume$1.39M
Net Assets120.14B
HQGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IWF commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 120B vs. HQGO (47.8M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IWF (15.955) vs HQGO (9.400). HQGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HQGO (2 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34).
| HQGO | IWF | HQGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 9.400 | 15.955 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 47.8M | 120B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.18 | 189% |
| Turnover | N/A | 13.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.42 | 0.34 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 31% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| EQIX - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| NXPI - HQGO | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
More | ||||