Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HQGO vs IWF
HQGO vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts HQGO vs IWF
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Price$54.97
Change+$0.52 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.36M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$428.27
Change+$4.75 (+1.12%)
Volume$567.68K
Net Assets112.55B
HQGO vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HQGO vs. IWF commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HQGO is a Buy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 113B vs. HQGO (45.4M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than HQGO: IWF (6.864) vs HQGO (0.533). HQGO was incepted earlier than IWF: HQGO (2 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than HQGO (0.34). HQGO has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| HQGO | IWF | HQGO / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 0.533 | 6.864 | 8% |
| Net Assets | 45.4M | 113B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.19 | 179% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 12.00 | 283% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.42 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HQGO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HQGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HQGO has been loosely correlated with NTAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HQGO jumps, then NTAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HQGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQGO | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTAP - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| AAPL - HQGO | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| PPG - HQGO | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| ADSK - HQGO | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| NXPI - HQGO | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
More | ||||