HRBK
Price
$20.38
Change
+$1.38 (+7.26%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
24.5M
HVLM
Price
$27.65
Change
+$0.05 (+0.18%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
24.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HRBK vs HVLM

Header iconHRBK vs HVLM Comparison
Open Charts HRBK vs HVLMBanner chart's image
Harbor Bankshares
Price$20.38
Change+$1.38 (+7.26%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization24.5M
Huron Valley Ban
Price$27.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.18%)
Volume$350
Capitalization24.27M
HRBK vs HVLM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HRBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HVLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRBK vs. HVLM commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRBK is a Buy and HVLM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HRBK: $20.38 vs. HVLM: $27.65)
Brand notoriety: HRBK and HVLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRBK: 275% vs. HVLM: 114%
Market capitalization -- HRBK: $24.5M vs. HVLM: $24.27M
HRBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.5M. HVLM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $24.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHVLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HRBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HVLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRBK is a better buy in the long-term than HVLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HRBK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HVLM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HRBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HVLM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HVLM is a better buy in the short-term than HRBK.

Price Growth

HRBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HVLM (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRBK($24.5M) and HVLM($24.3M) have the same market capitalization . HRBK has higher P/E ratio than HVLM: HRBK (9.66) vs HVLM (8.69). HRBK YTD gains are higher at: 64.037 vs. HVLM (3.947).
HRBKHVLMHRBK / HVLM
Capitalization24.5M24.3M101%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD64.0373.9471,622%
P/E Ratio9.668.69111%
Revenue24.7MN/A-
Total Cash7.89MN/A-
Total Debt7.22MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRBK vs HVLM: Fundamental Ratings
HRBK
HVLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3848
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33100
SMR RATING
1..100
51100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10088
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HVLM's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as HRBK (47). This means that HVLM’s stock grew similarly to HRBK’s over the last 12 months.

HRBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HVLM (100). This means that HRBK’s stock grew significantly faster than HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

HRBK's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVLM (100). This means that HRBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

HRBK's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as HVLM (58). This means that HRBK’s stock grew similarly to HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

HVLM's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as HRBK (100). This means that HVLM’s stock grew similarly to HRBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRBKHVLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
4%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HRBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HVLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACAZF12.97N/A
N/A
Acadian Timber Corp
ACBD0.60N/A
N/A
Annabidiol Corp.
MTAGF4.96N/A
N/A
Ceconomy AG
BSND855.00N/A
N/A
Boston Sand & Gravel Co.
HNSDF93.96N/A
N/A
HENSOLDT AG

HRBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HRBK and HSNGY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRBK and HSNGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRBK
1D Price
Change %
HRBK100%
N/A
HSNGY - HRBK
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
HRGG - HRBK
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFN - HRBK
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HVLM - HRBK
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFBK - HRBK
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

HVLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HVLM and WRIV have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVLM and WRIV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVLM
1D Price
Change %
HVLM100%
N/A
WRIV - HVLM
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
QNBC - HVLM
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFN - HVLM
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRGG - HVLM
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRBK - HVLM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More