Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRCCX vs RGABX
HRCCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts HRCCX vs RGABX
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec C
Price$31.36
Change-$0.10 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets549.92M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
HRCCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRCCX vs. RGABX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRCCX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. HRCCX (550M). HRCCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . HRCCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: HRCCX (30 years) vs RGABX (23 years). HRCCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HRCCX (22.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRCCX: RGABX (250) vs HRCCX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. HRCCX (11.32). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. HRCCX (-13.19).
| HRCCX | RGABX | HRCCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.39 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.39 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.206 | 13.731 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 550M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 12.81 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.30 | 37.40 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.19 | 36.01 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.93 | 72.15 | -4% |