HRGG
Price
$14.90
Change
-$0.05 (-0.33%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
25.47M
IBWC
Price
$42.00
Change
+$2.00 (+5.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
14.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HRGG vs IBWC

Header iconHRGG vs IBWC Comparison
Open Charts HRGG vs IBWCBanner chart's image
Heritage Nola Ban
Price$14.90
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
Volume$161
Capitalization25.47M
IBW Financial
Price$42.00
Change+$2.00 (+5.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization14.85M
HRGG vs IBWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRGG vs. IBWC commentary
Jun 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRGG is a Hold and IBWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2025
Stock price -- (HRGG: $14.65 vs. IBWC: $42.00)
Brand notoriety: HRGG and IBWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRGG: 149% vs. IBWC: 15%
Market capitalization -- HRGG: $25.47M vs. IBWC: $14.85M
HRGG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.47M. IBWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRGG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIBWC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HRGG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IBWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBWC is a better buy in the long-term than HRGG.

Price Growth

HRGG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.68% price change this week, while IBWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

HRGG is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRGG($25.5M) has a higher market cap than IBWC($14.9M). IBWC YTD gains are higher at: 0.599 vs. HRGG (-2.333).
HRGGIBWCHRGG / IBWC
Capitalization25.5M14.9M171%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.3330.599-390%
P/E Ratio68.97N/A-
Revenue4.64MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt19.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRGG vs IBWC: Fundamental Ratings
HRGG
IBWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8794
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6740
SMR RATING
1..100
977
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
712
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBWC's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRGG (91). This means that IBWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

IBWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as HRGG (67). This means that IBWC’s stock grew similarly to HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IBWC (77). This means that HRGG’s stock grew significantly faster than IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (54). This means that HRGG’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (12). This means that HRGG’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTSOX39.020.66
+1.72%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth R6
CWMAX61.55N/A
N/A
American Funds Washington Mutual 529A
GIFFX21.99N/A
N/A
Invesco Growth and Income R6
FIQFX42.38N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
MLOIX8.77N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy I

HRGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HRGG and MBKL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRGG and MBKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRGG
1D Price
Change %
HRGG100%
-1.71%
MBKL - HRGG
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERKH - HRGG
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - HRGG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRBK - HRGG
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBWC - HRGG
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IBWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBWC and BPCGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBWC and BPCGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBWC
1D Price
Change %
IBWC100%
N/A
BPCGF - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVLF - IBWC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILPMY - IBWC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRGG - IBWC
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
More