HRGG
Price
$17.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
25.47M
MBKL
Price
$21.51
Change
-$0.37 (-1.69%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
50.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HRGG vs MBKL

Header iconHRGG vs MBKL Comparison
Open Charts HRGG vs MBKLBanner chart's image
Heritage Nola Ban
Price$17.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization25.47M
MBT Bancshares
Price$21.51
Change-$0.37 (-1.69%)
Volume$100
Capitalization50.07M
HRGG vs MBKL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HRGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRGG vs. MBKL commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRGG is a Buy and MBKL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HRGG: $17.70 vs. MBKL: $21.51)
Brand notoriety: HRGG and MBKL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRGG: 234% vs. MBKL: 43%
Market capitalization -- HRGG: $25.47M vs. MBKL: $50.07M
HRGG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.47M. MBKL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $50.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRGG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBKL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HRGG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBKL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBKL is a better buy in the long-term than HRGG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HRGG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBKL’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HRGG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBKL’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HRGG is a better buy in the short-term than MBKL.

Price Growth

HRGG (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MBKL (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

HRGG is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBKL($50.1M) has a higher market cap than HRGG($25.5M). HRGG YTD gains are higher at: 18.000 vs. MBKL (10.173). MBKL has less debt than HRGG: MBKL (10M) vs HRGG (19.2M). MBKL has higher revenues than HRGG: MBKL (15.1M) vs HRGG (4.64M).
HRGGMBKLHRGG / MBKL
Capitalization25.5M50.1M51%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.00010.173177%
P/E Ratio68.97N/A-
Revenue4.64M15.1M31%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt19.2M10M192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRGG vs MBKL: Fundamental Ratings
HRGG
MBKL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5158
SMR RATING
1..100
948
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
746
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBKL's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRGG (91). This means that MBKL’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MBKL (58). This means that HRGG’s stock grew similarly to MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBKL (48). This means that HRGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as MBKL (48). This means that HRGG’s stock grew similarly to MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBKL (46). This means that HRGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRGGMBKL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
36%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HRGG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMRVF0.070.01
+19.66%
Smooth Rock Ventures Corp.
HPGLY73.37N/A
N/A
Hapag-Llyod AG
JYSKY13.38N/A
N/A
Jyske Bank A/S
MBKL21.51N/A
N/A
MBT Bancshares, Inc.
YITYY1.35N/A
N/A
YIT OYJ

HRGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HRGG and MBKL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRGG and MBKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRGG
1D Price
Change %
HRGG100%
N/A
MBKL - HRGG
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERKH - HRGG
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
CRZBF - HRGG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRBK - HRGG
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBWC - HRGG
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MBKL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBKL has been loosely correlated with CMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBKL jumps, then CMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBKL
1D Price
Change %
MBKL100%
N/A
CMGGF - MBKL
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - MBKL
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - MBKL
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
CRZBF - MBKL
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCBN - MBKL
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
More