HRGG
Price
$14.50
Change
+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
25.47M
MBKL
Price
$21.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
50.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HRGG vs MBKL

Header iconHRGG vs MBKL Comparison
Open Charts HRGG vs MBKLBanner chart's image
Heritage Nola Ban
Price$14.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Volume$1.89K
Capitalization25.47M
MBT Bancshares
Price$21.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization50.07M
HRGG vs MBKL Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRGG vs. MBKL commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRGG is a Hold and MBKL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (HRGG: $14.60 vs. MBKL: $21.00)
Brand notoriety: HRGG and MBKL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRGG: 29% vs. MBKL: 42%
Market capitalization -- HRGG: $25.47M vs. MBKL: $50.07M
HRGG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.47M. MBKL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $50.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRGG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBKL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HRGG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBKL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBKL is a better buy in the long-term than HRGG.

Price Growth

HRGG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.04% price change this week, while MBKL (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

HRGG is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.46% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBKL($50.1M) has a higher market cap than HRGG($25.5M). MBKL YTD gains are higher at: 5.000 vs. HRGG (-3.333). MBKL has less debt than HRGG: MBKL (10M) vs HRGG (19.2M). MBKL has higher revenues than HRGG: MBKL (15.1M) vs HRGG (4.64M).
HRGGMBKLHRGG / MBKL
Capitalization25.5M50.1M51%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.3335.000-67%
P/E Ratio68.97N/A-
Revenue4.64M15.1M31%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt19.2M10M192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRGG vs MBKL: Fundamental Ratings
HRGG
MBKL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6754
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
757
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBKL's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRGG (91). This means that MBKL’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as HRGG (67). This means that MBKL’s stock grew similarly to HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as HRGG (9). This means that MBKL’s stock grew similarly to HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as HRGG (56). This means that MBKL’s stock grew similarly to HRGG’s over the last 12 months.

HRGG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBKL (57). This means that HRGG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DXJ113.680.41
+0.36%
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity ETF
MXI84.97N/A
+0.01%
iShares Global Materials ETF
PMAY36.98-0.01
-0.03%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-May
IQDY31.50-0.16
-0.49%
FlexShares Intl Qual Div Dynamic ETF
NIKL10.88-0.13
-1.18%
Sprott Nickel Miners ETF

MBKL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBKL has been loosely correlated with CMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBKL jumps, then CMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBKL
1D Price
Change %
MBKL100%
N/A
CMGGF - MBKL
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - MBKL
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
FFMR - MBKL
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
CRZBF - MBKL
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
HCBN - MBKL
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More