HRIBF
Price
$61.03
Change
+$2.80 (+4.81%)
Updated
Feb 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.51B
JELLF
Price
$38.44
Change
+$0.71 (+1.88%)
Updated
Feb 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.77B
Ad is loading...

HRIBF vs JELLF

Header iconHRIBF vs JELLF Comparison
Open Charts HRIBF vs JELLFBanner chart's image
Horiba
Price$61.03
Change+$2.80 (+4.81%)
Volume$242
Capitalization2.51B
Jeol
Price$38.44
Change+$0.71 (+1.88%)
Volume$857
Capitalization1.77B
HRIBF vs JELLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRIBF vs. JELLF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRIBF is a Hold and JELLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (HRIBF: $61.03 vs. JELLF: $38.44)
Brand notoriety: HRIBF and JELLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRIBF: 151% vs. JELLF: 227%
Market capitalization -- HRIBF: $2.51B vs. JELLF: $1.77B
HRIBF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $2.51B. JELLF’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $1.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $109.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRIBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJELLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HRIBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JELLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JELLF is a better buy in the long-term than HRIBF.

Price Growth

HRIBF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JELLF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-0.78% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRIBF($2.51B) has a higher market cap than JELLF($1.77B). JELLF has higher P/E ratio than HRIBF: JELLF (14.12) vs HRIBF (8.03). HRIBF YTD gains are higher at: 4.817 vs. JELLF (1.882). HRIBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 55.7B vs. JELLF (24.4B). HRIBF has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. JELLF (36.3B). JELLF has less debt than HRIBF: JELLF (12.7B) vs HRIBF (56.3B). HRIBF has higher revenues than JELLF: HRIBF (280B) vs JELLF (155B).
HRIBFJELLFHRIBF / JELLF
Capitalization2.51B1.77B142%
EBITDA55.7B24.4B228%
Gain YTD4.8171.882256%
P/E Ratio8.0314.1257%
Revenue280B155B181%
Total Cash127B36.3B350%
Total Debt56.3B12.7B443%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRIBF: Fundamental Ratings
HRIBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMIYX7.10-0.08
-1.11%
BNY Mellon Income Stock Y
WQAIX11.60-0.18
-1.53%
Westwood Quality AllCap Institutional
EGORX18.30-0.42
-2.24%
Allspring Large Cap Core R6
PRJBX45.45-1.16
-2.49%
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities R2
DWOAX19.79-0.64
-3.13%
BNY Mellon Research Growth A

HRIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRIBF has been loosely correlated with KRMKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRIBF jumps, then KRMKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRIBF
1D Price
Change %
HRIBF100%
N/A
KRMKF - HRIBF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HXGBY - HRIBF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
KYCCF - HRIBF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
KRKNF - HRIBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.59%
JELLF - HRIBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JELLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JELLF and LCTC have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JELLF and LCTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JELLF
1D Price
Change %
JELLF100%
N/A
LCTC - JELLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
CAZGF - JELLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HXGBY - JELLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
HRIBF - JELLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HXGBF - JELLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More