Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HRLCX vs RIDAX
HRLCX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts HRLCX vs RIDAX
Hartford Real Asset C
Price$9.23
Change+$0.04 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.42M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$26.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.58B
HRLCX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HRLCX vs. RIDAX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRLCX is a Buy and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. HRLCX (62.4M). RIDAX pays higher dividends than HRLCX: RIDAX (2.98) vs HRLCX (2.65). HRLCX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: HRLCX (15 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). HRLCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than RIDAX (1.36). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. RIDAX (92.00). RIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: RIDAX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). RIDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.52 vs. HRLCX (7.90). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.43 vs. RIDAX (33.59).
| HRLCX | RIDAX | HRLCX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.36 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.36 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.732 | 12.359 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.4M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 2.98 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.90 | 9.52 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.61 | 23.69 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.43 | 33.59 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.99 | 51.26 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement