HRSEF
Price
$105.81
Change
-$10.95 (-9.38%)
Updated
Mar 18 closing price
IEHC
Price
$11.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

HRSEF vs IEHC

Header iconHRSEF vs IEHC Comparison
Open Charts HRSEF vs IEHCBanner chart's image
Hirose Electric
Price$105.81
Change-$10.95 (-9.38%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
IEH
Price$11.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$570
CapitalizationN/A
HRSEF vs IEHC Comparison Chart
Loading...
IEHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRSEF vs. IEHC commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRSEF is a Buy and IEHC is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (HRSEF: $105.81 vs. IEHC: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: HRSEF and IEHC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRSEF: 100% vs. IEHC: 24%
Market capitalization -- HRSEF: $4.11B vs. IEHC: $26.18M
HRSEF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $4.11B. IEHC’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $26.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $89.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRSEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIEHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HRSEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IEHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRSEF is a better buy in the long-term than IEHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IEHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IEHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

HRSEF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IEHC (@Electronic Components) price change was +15.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-0.37% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRSEF($4.11B) has a higher market cap than IEHC($26.2M). IEHC has higher P/E ratio than HRSEF: IEHC (220.00) vs HRSEF (21.53). IEHC YTD gains are higher at: 41.935 vs. HRSEF (-9.378). HRSEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 61.1B vs. IEHC (15.1K). HRSEF has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. IEHC (8.59M). IEHC has less debt than HRSEF: IEHC (2.42M) vs HRSEF (5.65B). HRSEF has higher revenues than IEHC: HRSEF (177B) vs IEHC (26.5M).
HRSEFIEHCHRSEF / IEHC
Capitalization4.11B26.2M15,679%
EBITDA61.1B15.1K404,635,762%
Gain YTD-9.37841.935-22%
P/E Ratio21.53220.0010%
Revenue177B26.5M667,925%
Total Cash159B8.59M1,851,421%
Total Debt5.65B2.42M233,623%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRSEF vs IEHC: Fundamental Ratings
HRSEF
IEHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4927
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
788
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3838
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HRSEF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IEHC (88). This means that HRSEF’s stock grew significantly faster than IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

HRSEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as IEHC (100). This means that HRSEF’s stock grew similarly to IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

HRSEF's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IEHC (88). This means that HRSEF’s stock grew significantly faster than IEHC’s over the last 12 months.

IEHC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HRSEF (70). This means that IEHC’s stock grew similarly to HRSEF’s over the last 12 months.

IEHC's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HRSEF (38). This means that IEHC’s stock grew similarly to HRSEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRSEFIEHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IEHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYIFX19.98-0.06
-0.30%
Monetta Young Investor Growth
RSOOX38.00-0.16
-0.42%
Columbia Dividend Opportunity R
DFDPX38.71-0.17
-0.44%
DF Dent Premier Growth Investor
PBCJX47.05-0.26
-0.55%
Principal Blue Chip J
TQSIX23.56-0.23
-0.97%
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq I

HRSEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HRSEF and MNBEF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRSEF and MNBEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRSEF
1D Price
Change %
HRSEF100%
N/A
MNBEF - HRSEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNNDF - HRSEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KULR - HRSEF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
JNPKF - HRSEF
0%
Poorly correlated
-14.13%
IEHC - HRSEF
0%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
More

IEHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IEHC and IBIDF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IEHC and IBIDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEHC
1D Price
Change %
IEHC100%
-4.35%
IBIDF - IEHC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPDYY - IEHC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBEF - IEHC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IACYF - IEHC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNNDF - IEHC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More