HRSEF vs KULR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRSEF is a Hold and KULR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HRSEF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKULR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HRSEF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- KULR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KULR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- KULR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HRSEF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KULR (@Electronic Components) price change was -17.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -6.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
KULR is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-6.56% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| HRSEF | KULR | HRSEF / KULR | |
| Capitalization | 3.85B | 306M | 1,259% |
| EBITDA | 61.1B | -14.49M | -421,585% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -63.944 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 21.53 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 177B | 9.7M | 1,824,554% |
| Total Cash | 159B | 912K | 17,434,211% |
| Total Debt | 5.65B | 2.7M | 209,533% |
HRSEF | KULR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HRSEF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KULR (72). This means that HRSEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.
HRSEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as KULR (100). This means that HRSEF’s stock grew similarly to KULR’s over the last 12 months.
HRSEF's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KULR (100). This means that HRSEF’s stock grew significantly faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.
KULR's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRSEF (69). This means that KULR’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRSEF’s over the last 12 months.
HRSEF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KULR (100). This means that HRSEF’s stock grew significantly faster than KULR’s over the last 12 months.
| KULR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
HRSEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HRSEF and MNBEF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRSEF and MNBEF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HRSEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRSEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MNBEF - HRSEF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JNNDF - HRSEF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KULR - HRSEF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| JNPKF - HRSEF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IEHC - HRSEF | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
More | ||||
KULR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KULR and OUST have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KULR and OUST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KULR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KULR | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| OUST - KULR | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.06% | ||
| JBL - KULR | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
| MTEK - KULR | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.22% | ||
| APH - KULR | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.77% | ||
| VICR - KULR | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.30% | ||
More | ||||