HRZN
Price
$8.75
Change
+$0.08 (+0.92%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
377.4M
4 days until earnings call
STJPF
Price
$11.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
6.63B
Ad is loading...

HRZN vs STJPF

Header iconHRZN vs STJPF Comparison
Open Charts HRZN vs STJPFBanner chart's image
Horizon Technology Finance
Price$8.75
Change+$0.08 (+0.92%)
Volume$217.28K
Capitalization377.4M
St. James Place Capital
Price$11.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization6.63B
HRZN vs STJPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HRZN vs. STJPF commentary
Apr 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRZN is a StrongBuy and STJPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HRZN: $8.75 vs. STJPF: $11.00)
Brand notoriety: HRZN and STJPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRZN: 58% vs. STJPF: 71%
Market capitalization -- HRZN: $377.4M vs. STJPF: $6.63B
HRZN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $377.4M. STJPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRZN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSTJPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HRZN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • STJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRZN is a better buy in the long-term than STJPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HRZN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HRZN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

HRZN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.29% price change this week, while STJPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

HRZN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

STJPF is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.64% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STJPF($6.63B) has a higher market cap than HRZN($377M). HRZN has higher P/E ratio than STJPF: HRZN (20.82) vs STJPF (16.00). STJPF YTD gains are higher at: 25.142 vs. HRZN (2.162). STJPF has more cash in the bank: 6.68B vs. HRZN (46.6M). STJPF has less debt than HRZN: STJPF (316M) vs HRZN (462M). STJPF has higher revenues than HRZN: STJPF (12.4B) vs HRZN (-9.87M).
HRZNSTJPFHRZN / STJPF
Capitalization377M6.63B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.16225.1429%
P/E Ratio20.8216.00130%
Revenue-9.87M12.4B-0%
Total Cash46.6M6.68B1%
Total Debt462M316M146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRZN vs STJPF: Fundamental Ratings
HRZN
STJPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1531
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4789
SMR RATING
1..100
1718
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
877
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HRZN's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STJPF (82). This means that HRZN’s stock grew significantly faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

HRZN's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STJPF (89). This means that HRZN’s stock grew somewhat faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

HRZN's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as STJPF (18). This means that HRZN’s stock grew similarly to STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

STJPF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as HRZN (73). This means that STJPF’s stock grew similarly to HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

HRZN's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STJPF (77). This means that HRZN’s stock grew significantly faster than STJPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRZN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAYMX146.310.22
+0.15%
Oakmark Advisor
GGOIX19.69N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth Instl
FIRAX9.51N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate A
GEMUX23.65N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq R6
SGZFX50.49N/A
N/A
Saturna Growth Z

HRZN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRZN has been closely correlated with SCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HRZN jumps, then SCM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRZN
1D Price
Change %
HRZN100%
+0.92%
SCM - HRZN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
GLAD - HRZN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
HTGC - HRZN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
FDUS - HRZN
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
FSK - HRZN
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More

STJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STJPF and HRZN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STJPF and HRZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJPF
1D Price
Change %
STJPF100%
N/A
HRZN - STJPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
SLFPF - STJPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - STJPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
SLFPY - STJPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TETAA - STJPF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More