HRZN
Price
$11.00
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
44 days until earnings call
TPVG
Price
$7.14
Change
-$0.42 (-5.56%)
Updated
Sep 16, 11:15 AM (EDT)
44 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HRZN vs TPVG

Header iconHRZN vs TPVG Comparison
Open Charts HRZN vs TPVGBanner chart's image
Horizon Technology Finance
Price$11.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$545.76K
CapitalizationN/A
TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC
Price$7.14
Change-$0.42 (-5.56%)
Volume$849
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
HRZN vs TPVG Comparison Chart
Loading...
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TPVG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
HRZN vs. TPVG commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRZN is a StrongBuy and TPVG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (HRZN: $11.00 vs. TPVG: $7.56)
Brand notoriety: HRZN and TPVG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HRZN: 207% vs. TPVG: 146%
Market capitalization -- HRZN: $377.4M vs. TPVG: $351.37M
HRZN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $377.4M. TPVG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $351.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HRZN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTPVG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HRZN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TPVG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRZN is a better buy in the long-term than TPVG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HRZN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPVG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HRZN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TPVG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TPVG is a better buy in the short-term than HRZN.

Price Growth

HRZN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while TPVG (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

HRZN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2024.

TPVG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.94% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRZN($377M) has a higher market cap than TPVG($351M). TPVG has higher P/E ratio than HRZN: TPVG (72.29) vs HRZN (20.82). HRZN YTD gains are higher at: -9.722 vs. TPVG (-24.239). HRZN has more cash in the bank: 46.6M vs. TPVG (24.9M). HRZN has less debt than TPVG: HRZN (462M) vs TPVG (608M). HRZN has higher revenues than TPVG: HRZN (-9.87M) vs TPVG (-27.07M).
HRZNTPVGHRZN / TPVG
Capitalization377M351M107%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.722-24.23940%
P/E Ratio20.8272.2929%
Revenue-9.87M-27.07M36%
Total Cash46.6M24.9M187%
Total Debt462M608M76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HRZN vs TPVG: Fundamental Ratings
HRZN
TPVG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
943
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46100
SMR RATING
1..100
7455
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TPVG's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as HRZN (14). This means that TPVG’s stock grew similarly to HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

HRZN's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TPVG (100). This means that HRZN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TPVG’s over the last 12 months.

TPVG's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HRZN (74). This means that TPVG’s stock grew similarly to HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

HRZN's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as TPVG (62). This means that HRZN’s stock grew similarly to TPVG’s over the last 12 months.

TPVG's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HRZN (11). This means that TPVG’s stock grew similarly to HRZN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HRZNTPVG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HRZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TPVG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMBLX48.491.28
+2.71%
RMB Mendon Financial Services I
FRUSX23.940.35
+1.48%
Franklin Utilities C
INSCX19.370.19
+0.99%
Catalyst Insider Buying C
DGOYX45.350.35
+0.78%
Davis Opportunity Y
MKILX20.18N/A
N/A
BlackRock International K

HRZN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRZN has been loosely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRZN jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRZN
1D Price
Change %
HRZN100%
+0.09%
MAIN - HRZN
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
HTGC - HRZN
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
PFLT - HRZN
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
ARCC - HRZN
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
FDUS - HRZN
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More