Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSAFX vs PASCX
HSAFX vs PASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSAFX vs. PASCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSAFX is a Buy and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. HSAFX (27.4M). PASCX pays higher dividends than HSAFX: PASCX (5.07) vs HSAFX (2.08). HSAFX was incepted earlier than PASCX: HSAFX (6 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.15) is less costly to investors than HSAFX (2.18). HSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. PASCX (40.00). HSAFX (1000) and PASCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HSAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.75 vs. PASCX (7.46). PASCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.41 vs. HSAFX (-1.29).
| HSAFX | PASCX | HSAFX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 3.06 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 3.15 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.221 | 6.942 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4M | 10.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 5.07 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | 7.46 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.14 | 13.86 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.29 | 29.41 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement