Advertisement
HSEEF vs NWINF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSEEF is a Hold and NWINF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HSEEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNWINF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HSEEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NWINF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HSEEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWINF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HSEEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NWINF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HSEEF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -6.60% price change this week, while NWINF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +6.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.84%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.82%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.11% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
@Beverages: Alcoholic (+0.55% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| HSEEF | NWINF | HSEEF / NWINF | |
| Capitalization | 403K | 80.1M | 1% |
| EBITDA | -782.81K | -8.21M | 10% |
| Gain YTD | -42.741 | 84.348 | -51% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.34M | 270M | 1% |
| Total Cash | 194K | 29.3M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 3.14M | 9.19M | 34% |
HSEEF | NWINF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HSEEF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as NWINF (88). This means that HSEEF’s stock grew similarly to NWINF’s over the last 12 months.
HSEEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NWINF (100). This means that HSEEF’s stock grew similarly to NWINF’s over the last 12 months.
NWINF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as HSEEF (100). This means that NWINF’s stock grew similarly to HSEEF’s over the last 12 months.
HSEEF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as NWINF (50). This means that HSEEF’s stock grew similarly to NWINF’s over the last 12 months.
NWINF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSEEF (62). This means that NWINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSEEF’s over the last 12 months.
| HSEEF | NWINF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
HSEEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HSEEF and NWINF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSEEF and NWINF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSEEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSEEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NWINF - HSEEF | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.64% | ||
| HINKF - HSEEF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| HEINY - HSEEF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| HKHHY - HSEEF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
| HKHHF - HSEEF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
More | ||||
NWINF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NWINF and FMXUF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWINF and FMXUF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NWINF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NWINF | 100% | -3.64% | ||
| FMXUF - NWINF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KNBWY - NWINF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.88% | ||
| HSEEF - NWINF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HEINY - NWINF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| HINKF - NWINF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||