Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSGFX vs JHQCX
HSGFX vs JHQCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSGFX vs. JHQCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSGFX is a Hold and JHQCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JHQCX has more cash in the bank: 21B vs. HSGFX (364M). HSGFX pays higher dividends than JHQCX: HSGFX (2.87) vs JHQCX (0.06). HSGFX was incepted earlier than JHQCX: HSGFX (25 years) vs JHQCX (12 years). JHQCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than HSGFX (1.23). HSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 470.00 vs. JHQCX (20.00). HSGFX (1000) and JHQCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. JHQCX (3.31). JHQCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.34 vs. HSGFX (5.87).
| HSGFX | JHQCX | HSGFX / JHQCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.33 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.33 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.577 | 3.978 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 364M | 21B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 0.06 | 4,438% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 3.31 | 352% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.86 | 42.84 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.87 | 46.34 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.15 | 120.29 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement