Ad is loading...
HSGFX vs QLENX
HSGFX vs QLENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSGFX vs. QLENX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSGFX is a Hold and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLENX has more cash in the bank: 2.61B vs. HSGFX (295M). QLENX pays higher dividends than HSGFX: QLENX (18.52) vs HSGFX (3.17). HSGFX was incepted earlier than QLENX: HSGFX (25 years) vs QLENX (12 years). HSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. QLENX (0.00). HSGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: HSGFX (1000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.10 vs. HSGFX (-6.11). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 115.12 vs. HSGFX (12.67).
| HSGFX | QLENX | HSGFX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.277 | 4.233 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 295M | 2.61B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 18.52 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.11 | 28.10 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.71 | 75.15 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.67 | 115.12 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -32.03 | 131.79 | -24% |