Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMNX
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$38.47
Change-$0.54 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.54M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.07
Change-$0.25 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.22M
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. WCMNX (45.2M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLAX (1.25) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLAX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLAX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLAX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. HSLAX (-7.47). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 18.93 vs. HSLAX (-21.47).
| HSLAX | WCMNX | HSLAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.04 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.990 | 4.965 | -20% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 45.2M | 655% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.47 | 7.94 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.97 | 10.82 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.47 | 18.93 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers