Ad is loading...
HSLAX vs WCMNX
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$32.86
Change+$2.88 (+9.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.88M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$10.93
Change+$1.05 (+10.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.21M
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 239M vs. WCMNX (36.2M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLAX (1.37) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLAX (23 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.32). HSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMNX (48.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLAX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLAX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -23.23 vs. HSLAX (-28.80). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 15.96 vs. HSLAX (-22.54).
| HSLAX | WCMNX | HSLAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.24 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 2.11 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.909 | -22.143 | 108% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 36.2M | 660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.80 | -23.23 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.92 | -15.70 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.54 | 15.96 | -141% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers