Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMNX
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$40.00
Change+$0.06 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.71M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13M
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. WCMNX (41.1M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLAX (1.14) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLAX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLAX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLAX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLAX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.36 vs. HSLAX (-12.62). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -2.21 vs. HSLAX (-30.69).
| HSLAX | WCMNX | HSLAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.04 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.523 | 1.261 | 121% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 41.1M | 698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.62 | -2.36 | 536% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.49 | 20.09 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.69 | -2.21 | 1,391% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement