Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMNX
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$36.49
Change+$0.32 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.46M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.99
Change+$0.19 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.71M
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 281M vs. WCMNX (40.7M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLAX (1.33) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLAX (23 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLAX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLAX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLAX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.59 vs. HSLAX (-14.44). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.31 vs. HSLAX (-17.82).
| HSLAX | WCMNX | HSLAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.04 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.198 | -7.013 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 40.7M | 690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.44 | -3.59 | 402% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.73 | 23.69 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.82 | 19.31 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | -30.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement