Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLAX vs WCMNX
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLAX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth A
Price$38.03
Change+$0.36 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets288.99M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.92
Change+$0.15 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.68M
HSLAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLAX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLAX has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. WCMNX (43.7M). HSLAX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLAX (1.27) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLAX (23 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLAX (1.33). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLAX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLAX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLAX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.00 vs. HSLAX (-14.58). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 21.50 vs. HSLAX (-19.99).
| HSLAX | WCMNX | HSLAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.04 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.391 | 0.630 | -696% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 43.7M | 661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.64 | 21.16 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.99 | 21.50 | -93% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement