Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMNX
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$37.34
Change+$0.30 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.56M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.80
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.22M
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 280M vs. WCMNX (42.2M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLCX (0.49) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) and WCMNX (2.04) have similar cost to investors . WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLCX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLCX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.08 vs. HSLCX (-15.29). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 11.79 vs. HSLCX (-40.84).
| HSLCX | WCMNX | HSLCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.24 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.04 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.271 | -7.329 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280M | 42.2M | 664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.29 | -4.08 | 375% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.30 | 9.80 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.84 | 11.79 | -346% |
| Returns for 10 years | -55.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement