Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMNX
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$39.81
Change+$0.45 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.53M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.56
Change+$0.12 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 294M vs. WCMNX (43M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLCX (0.47) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) and WCMNX (2.04) have similar cost to investors . WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLCX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLCX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.70 vs. HSLCX (-9.61). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.31 vs. HSLCX (-36.19).
| HSLCX | WCMNX | HSLCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.24 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.04 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.561 | -1.024 | 348% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 43M | 684% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.61 | 2.70 | -356% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.01 | 25.10 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.19 | 20.31 | -178% |
| Returns for 10 years | -52.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement