Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMNX
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$39.67
Change+$0.37 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets288.99M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.92
Change+$0.15 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.68M
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. WCMNX (43.7M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLCX (0.47) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) and WCMNX (2.04) have similar cost to investors . WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLCX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLCX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.00 vs. HSLCX (-14.88). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 21.50 vs. HSLCX (-38.02).
| HSLCX | WCMNX | HSLCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.24 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.04 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.797 | 0.630 | -761% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 43.7M | 661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.88 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.52 | 21.16 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -38.02 | 21.50 | -177% |
| Returns for 10 years | -53.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement