Ad is loading...
HSLCX vs WCMNX
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$33.48
Change+$0.20 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.55M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$10.67
Change+$0.10 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.09M
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 255M vs. WCMNX (39.1M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLCX (0.50) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). WCMNX (2.11) and HSLCX (2.10) have similar cost to investors . HSLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMNX (48.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLCX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLCX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.67 vs. HSLCX (-19.51). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. HSLCX (-36.85).
| HSLCX | WCMNX | HSLCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.24 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.11 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.895 | -15.918 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255M | 39.1M | 652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.51 | -11.67 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.96 | -7.86 | 318% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.85 | 22.93 | -161% |
| Returns for 10 years | -60.44 | N/A | - |