Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLCX vs WCMNX
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$41.56
Change+$0.22 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.47M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.51
Change+$0.12 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 296M vs. WCMNX (45M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLCX (0.45) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLCX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) and WCMNX (2.04) have similar cost to investors . WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLCX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLCX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. HSLCX (-7.72). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.52 vs. HSLCX (-36.27).
| HSLCX | WCMNX | HSLCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.24 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.04 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.678 | 6.462 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 45M | 658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.72 | 7.31 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.11 | 28.54 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.27 | 20.52 | -177% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement