Ad is loading...
HSLCX vs WCMNX
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLCX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth C
Price$37.29
Change+$1.33 (+3.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets270.49M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.07
Change+$0.49 (+4.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.98M
HSLCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLCX vs. WCMNX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLCX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLCX has more cash in the bank: 270M vs. WCMNX (42M). HSLCX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLCX (0.51) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLCX (23 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). HSLCX (2.10) and WCMNX (2.04) have similar cost to investors . WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLCX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLCX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLCX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.69 vs. HSLCX (-17.11). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. HSLCX (-33.23).
| HSLCX | WCMNX | HSLCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.24 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 2.04 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.888 | -8.747 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 42M | 643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.11 | -6.69 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.88 | 9.97 | -89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.23 | 27.39 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | -56.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...