Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMLX
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$46.43
Change+$0.61 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.67M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.95
Change+$0.21 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLFX (1.42) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLFX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMLX (100000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. HSLFX (-7.28). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.53 vs. HSLFX (-18.53).
| HSLFX | WCMLX | HSLFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.99 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.79 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.971 | 6.843 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 43.7M | 684% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.28 | 4.73 | -154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.10 | 34.97 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.53 | 12.53 | -148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement