Ad is loading...
HSLFX vs WCMLX
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$38.84
Change+$0.61 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.48M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 268M vs. WCMLX (42.1M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLFX (1.67) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLFX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMLX (100000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.86 vs. HSLFX (-15.75). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. HSLFX (-14.92).
| HSLFX | WCMLX | HSLFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.99 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.86 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.252 | -9.253 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 42.1M | 637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.75 | -6.86 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.43 | 15.89 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.92 | 21.31 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...