Ad is loading...
HSLFX vs WCMLX
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$35.83
Change+$0.55 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.78
Change+$0.16 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.46M
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. WCMLX (38.5M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLFX (1.65) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLFX (8 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.85). HSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMLX (100000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.03 vs. HSLFX (-22.92). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 24.50 vs. HSLFX (-13.65).
| HSLFX | WCMLX | HSLFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.86 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.946 | -17.418 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 38.5M | 652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.92 | -17.03 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.44 | -9.46 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.65 | 24.50 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers