Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMLX
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$45.17
Change+$0.22 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.1M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLFX (1.37) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLFX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMLX (100000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. HSLFX (-12.28). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. HSLFX (-26.59).
| HSLFX | WCMLX | HSLFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.99 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.79 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.997 | 1.788 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 41.3M | 695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.28 | -3.04 | 404% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.87 | 21.43 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.59 | -0.83 | 3,190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |