Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMLX
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$44.29
Change+$0.24 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.44M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLFX (1.51) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLFX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMLX (100000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.52 vs. HSLFX (-10.17). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.52 vs. HSLFX (-17.55).
| HSLFX | WCMLX | HSLFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.99 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.79 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.045 | 5.288 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 44.8M | 652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.17 | 3.52 | -289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.30 | 20.57 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.55 | 16.52 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement