Ad is loading...
HSLFX vs WCMLX
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$45.26
Change+$0.20 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets345.99M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.46
Change+$0.08 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.83M
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 346M vs. WCMLX (41.8M). HSLFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLFX (8 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). HSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMLX (100000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. HSLFX (6.51). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 23.03 vs. HSLFX (-14.87).
| HSLFX | WCMLX | HSLFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.700 | 4.666 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 41.8M | 828% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 11.89 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.23 | 7.77 | -67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.87 | 23.03 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...