Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLFX vs WCMLX
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLFX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth F
Price$42.19
Change+$0.39 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.04M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.70
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.42M
HSLFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLFX has more cash in the bank: 286M vs. WCMLX (42.4M). HSLFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLFX (1.53) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLFX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLFX (0.86). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLFX (68.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLFX: WCMLX (100000) vs HSLFX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.05 vs. HSLFX (-16.97). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 18.23 vs. HSLFX (-16.45).
| HSLFX | WCMLX | HSLFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.99 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.79 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.151 | -2.177 | 237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 42.4M | 675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.97 | -6.05 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.10 | 21.31 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.45 | 18.23 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement