Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLIX vs WCMLX
HSLIX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLIX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth I
Price$43.78
Change+$0.23 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.44M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
HSLIX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLIX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLIX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLIX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). HSLIX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLIX (1.43) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLIX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLIX (19 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLIX (0.96). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLIX (68.00). HSLIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLIX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.52 vs. HSLIX (-10.38). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.52 vs. HSLIX (-18.19).
| HSLIX | WCMLX | HSLIX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.99 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | 5.288 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 44.8M | 652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.38 | 3.52 | -295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.83 | 20.57 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.19 | 16.52 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement