Ad is loading...
HSLIX vs WCMLX
HSLIX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLIX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth I
Price$38.40
Change+$0.60 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.48M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
HSLIX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLIX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLIX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLIX has more cash in the bank: 268M vs. WCMLX (42.1M). HSLIX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLIX (1.58) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLIX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLIX (19 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HSLIX (0.96). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLIX (68.00). HSLIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLIX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.86 vs. HSLIX (-16.98). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. HSLIX (-15.87).
| HSLIX | WCMLX | HSLIX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.99 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.86 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.601 | -9.253 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 42.1M | 637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.98 | -6.86 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.50 | 15.89 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.87 | 21.31 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...