Ad is loading...
HSLIX vs WCMNX
HSLIX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLIX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth I
Price$38.40
Change+$0.60 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.48M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.64
Change+$0.13 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
HSLIX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLIX vs. WCMNX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLIX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLIX has more cash in the bank: 268M vs. WCMNX (42.1M). HSLIX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLIX (1.58) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLIX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLIX (19 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than HSLIX (0.96). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLIX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLIX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLIX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. HSLIX (-16.98). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.77 vs. HSLIX (-15.87).
| HSLIX | WCMNX | HSLIX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.24 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.11 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.601 | -9.299 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 42.1M | 637% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.98 | -7.10 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.50 | 14.99 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.87 | 19.77 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...