Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLIX vs WCMNX
HSLIX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLIX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth I
Price$43.78
Change+$0.23 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.44M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
HSLIX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLIX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLIX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLIX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. WCMNX (44.8M). HSLIX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLIX (1.43) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLIX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLIX (19 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLIX (0.96). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLIX (68.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSLIX: WCMNX (1000) vs HSLIX (2000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.33 vs. HSLIX (-10.38). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 15.09 vs. HSLIX (-18.19).
| HSLIX | WCMNX | HSLIX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.24 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.04 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | 5.201 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 44.8M | 652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.38 | 3.33 | -312% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.83 | 19.73 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.19 | 15.09 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement