Ad is loading...
HSLSX vs WCMLX
HSLSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLSX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth R4
Price$35.25
Change+$3.08 (+9.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.88M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.08
Change+$1.06 (+10.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.93M
HSLSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLSX has more cash in the bank: 239M vs. WCMLX (39.9M). HSLSX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLSX (1.30) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLSX (18 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HSLSX (1.27). HSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). HSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -23.04 vs. HSLSX (-28.18). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. HSLSX (-20.47).
| HSLSX | WCMLX | HSLSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.99 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.86 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.894 | -22.084 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 39.9M | 599% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.18 | -23.04 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -26.07 | -15.01 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.47 | 17.47 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...