Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLSX vs WCMLX
HSLSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HSLSX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth R4
Price$39.60
Change+$0.47 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.48M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.31
Change+$0.13 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.98M
HSLSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLSX has more cash in the bank: 284M vs. WCMLX (43M). HSLSX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HSLSX (1.27) vs WCMLX (0.00). HSLSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HSLSX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HSLSX (1.27). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLSX (68.00). HSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HSLSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.22 vs. HSLSX (-12.03). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 13.83 vs. HSLSX (-20.94).
| HSLSX | WCMLX | HSLSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.99 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.79 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.428 | -5.288 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 43M | 660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.03 | -1.22 | 989% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.53 | 10.63 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.94 | 13.83 | -151% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement