Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLSX vs WCMNX
HSLSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLSX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth R4
Price$39.04
Change+$0.18 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.23M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.95
Change+$0.06 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.15M
HSLSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLSX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLSX has more cash in the bank: 282M vs. WCMNX (41.1M). HSLSX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLSX (1.27) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLSX (19 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLSX (1.27). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLSX (68.00). HSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: HSLSX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.13 vs. HSLSX (-13.13). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.36 vs. HSLSX (-18.52).
| HSLSX | WCMNX | HSLSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.24 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.04 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.641 | -5.831 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 282M | 41.1M | 686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.13 | -2.13 | 617% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.54 | 26.59 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.52 | 16.36 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement