Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSLSX vs WCMNX
HSLSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HSLSX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth R4
Price$40.53
Change-$0.36 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.44M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.67
Change-$0.07 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.57M
HSLSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSLSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSLSX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HSLSX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. WCMNX (43.6M). HSLSX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HSLSX (1.21) vs WCMNX (0.00). HSLSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HSLSX (19 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HSLSX (1.27). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HSLSX (68.00). HSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: HSLSX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.92 vs. HSLSX (-14.15). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.96 vs. HSLSX (-17.35).
| HSLSX | WCMNX | HSLSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 1.24 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 2.04 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.265 | 0.394 | -829% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 43.6M | 670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.15 | -1.92 | 735% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.12 | 25.15 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.35 | 19.96 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement