Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSMFX vs SSGSX
HSMFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HSMFX vs SSGSX
Hartford Small Cap Value F
Price$12.78
Change-$0.08 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.11M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
HSMFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSMFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSMFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. HSMFX (185M). HSMFX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HSMFX (1.94) vs SSGSX (0.50). HSMFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HSMFX (9 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than HSMFX (0.89). HSMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSMFX: SSGSX (2500) vs HSMFX (1000000). HSMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.71 vs. SSGSX (-3.93). HSMFX return over 5 years is better than : 64.41 vs. SSGSX (20.68).
| HSMFX | SSGSX | HSMFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.26 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.500 | 1.852 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185M | 5.63B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.50 | 387% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.71 | -3.93 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.05 | -0.85 | -2,365% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.41 | 20.68 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement