Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSAX vs RPFGX
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSAX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$31.18
Change+$0.34 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.17M
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSAX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. HSSAX (50.2M). HSSAX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: HSSAX (1.89) vs RPFGX (1.35). HSSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSAX (28 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). HSSAX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). HSSAX (5%) and RPFGX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSAX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.66 vs. HSSAX (19.53). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 114.70 vs. HSSAX (35.68).
| HSSAX | RPFGX | HSSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.94 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.207 | 13.829 | 67% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.2M | 1.11B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.35 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.53 | 22.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.93 | 67.16 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.68 | 114.70 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.54 | 88.40 | 9% |