Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSAX vs RPFGX
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSAX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd A
Price$28.99
Change-$0.04 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.14M
HSSAX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSAX vs. RPFGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSAX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. HSSAX (45.1M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than HSSAX: RPFGX (1.30) vs HSSAX (0.00). HSSAX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSAX (29 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). HSSAX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). HSSAX (5%) and RPFGX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSAX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSAX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. HSSAX (-2.39). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.50 vs. HSSAX (2.54).
| HSSAX | RPFGX | HSSAX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.94 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.94 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.797 | 17.682 | 16% |
| Front Load | 5% | 5% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.1M | 1.12B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | 11.33 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.13 | 59.76 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.54 | 87.50 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.66 | 101.11 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement