Ad is loading...
HSSCX vs RPFGX
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSCX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$20.75
Change+$0.18 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.09M
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSCX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 933M vs. HSSCX (44.1M). HSSCX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: HSSCX (2.41) vs RPFGX (1.48). HSSCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSCX (25 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.95). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSCX (2000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.63 vs. RPFGX (16.61). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 93.34 vs. HSSCX (31.06).
| HSSCX | RPFGX | HSSCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.95 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.95 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.223 | -4.432 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.1M | 933M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 1.48 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.63 | 16.61 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.94 | 22.26 | -117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.06 | 93.34 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.87 | 68.67 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers