Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSCX vs RPFGX
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSCX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$24.81
Change-$0.30 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.18M
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSCX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. HSSCX (51.2M). HSSCX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: HSSCX (2.24) vs RPFGX (1.35). HSSCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSCX (25 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSCX (2000). HSSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.26 vs. RPFGX (27.71). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 120.57 vs. HSSCX (36.47).
| HSSCX | RPFGX | HSSCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.94 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.94 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.812 | 15.145 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.2M | 1.13B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 1.35 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.26 | 27.71 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.51 | 68.54 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.47 | 120.57 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.48 | 92.80 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement