Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSSCX vs RPFGX
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSCX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$23.14
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.14M
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSCX vs. RPFGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSCX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. HSSCX (45.1M). RPFGX pays higher dividends than HSSCX: RPFGX (1.30) vs HSSCX (0.00). HSSCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSCX (25 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). HSSCX (2.44) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSCX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. HSSCX (-2.93). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.50 vs. HSSCX (-1.28).
| HSSCX | RPFGX | HSSCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 0.94 | 260% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 0.94 | 260% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.295 | 17.682 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.1M | 1.12B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.93 | 11.33 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.71 | 59.76 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.28 | 87.50 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.55 | 101.11 | -13% |