Ad is loading...
HSSCX vs RPFGX
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts HSSCX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd C
Price$22.50
Change+$0.53 (+2.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.62M
HSSCX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSSCX vs. RPFGX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSSCX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. HSSCX (46.6M). HSSCX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: HSSCX (2.47) vs RPFGX (1.51). HSSCX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: HSSCX (25 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). HSSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.95). HSSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSSCX: RPFGX (1000) vs HSSCX (2000). RPFGX (19.26) and HSSCX (19.21) have marching annual gain over last year. RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 113.17 vs. HSSCX (30.02).
| HSSCX | RPFGX | HSSCX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.95 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.95 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.045 | 4.933 | -62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.6M | 1.01B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 1.51 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.21 | 19.26 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.97 | 45.27 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.02 | 113.17 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.01 | 80.81 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers