HSTXF
Price
$1.31
Change
+$0.01 (+0.77%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
329.41M
RGLD
Price
$200.63
Change
+$2.13 (+1.07%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.95B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HSTXF vs RGLD

Header iconHSTXF vs RGLD Comparison
Open Charts HSTXF vs RGLDBanner chart's image
Heliostar Metals
Price$1.31
Change+$0.01 (+0.77%)
Volume$278.29K
Capitalization329.41M
Royal Gold
Price$200.63
Change+$2.13 (+1.07%)
Volume$14.68K
Capitalization12.95B
HSTXF vs RGLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HSTXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HSTXF vs. RGLD commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSTXF is a Hold and RGLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (HSTXF: $1.31 vs. RGLD: $198.50)
Brand notoriety: HSTXF and RGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HSTXF: 133% vs. RGLD: 121%
Market capitalization -- HSTXF: $329.41M vs. RGLD: $12.95B
HSTXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $329.41M. RGLD’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $12.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $107.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HSTXF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HSTXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HSTXF and RGLD are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSTXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HSTXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGLD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the short-term than HSTXF.

Price Growth

HSTXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.82% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6148.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLD($12.9B) has a higher market cap than HSTXF($329M). RGLD has higher P/E ratio than HSTXF: RGLD (29.11) vs HSTXF (11.89). HSTXF YTD gains are higher at: 208.113 vs. RGLD (51.844). RGLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 658M vs. HSTXF (40.4M). RGLD has more cash in the bank: 248M vs. HSTXF (29.7M). HSTXF has less debt than RGLD: HSTXF (4.57M) vs RGLD (50M). RGLD has higher revenues than HSTXF: RGLD (799M) vs HSTXF (64.5M).
HSTXFRGLDHSTXF / RGLD
Capitalization329M12.9B3%
EBITDA40.4M658M6%
Gain YTD208.11351.844401%
P/E Ratio11.8929.1141%
Revenue64.5M799M8%
Total Cash29.7M248M12%
Total Debt4.57M50M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HSTXF vs RGLD: Fundamental Ratings
HSTXF
RGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1583
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
1855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
377
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLD's Valuation (19) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSTXF (66) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSTXF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSTXF (100) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSTXF’s over the last 12 months.

HSTXF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGLD (55) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HSTXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGLD’s over the last 12 months.

HSTXF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLD (44) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HSTXF’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.

HSTXF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGLD (77) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HSTXF’s stock grew significantly faster than RGLD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSTXFRGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HSTXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PQNCX18.26N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value C
PIREX28.41N/A
N/A
Principal Real Estate Securities Inst
WAMFX24.03N/A
N/A
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
BRZKX13.39N/A
N/A
BlackRock Sust Aware Adg Intl Eq K
GLPCX30.45N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras C

HSTXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSTXF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSTXF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSTXF
1D Price
Change %
HSTXF100%
+0.62%
PAAS - HSTXF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
CDE - HSTXF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
NGD - HSTXF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
RGLD - HSTXF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
FSM - HSTXF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More