Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUCX vs RGACX
HSUCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGACX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.33
Change+$0.35 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.64M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.15
Change+$1.12 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.88B
HSUCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. HSUCX (73.6M). RGACX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: RGACX (0.07) vs HSUCX (0.00). HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HSUCX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX (19.54) and RGACX (18.96) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.89 vs. HSUCX (-1.08).
| HSUCX | RGACX | HSUCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.94 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.94 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.105 | 14.113 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.6M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.54 | 18.96 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.92 | 41.55 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.08 | 41.89 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -82.47 | 84.41 | -98% |