Ad is loading...
HSUCX vs RGACX
HSUCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGACX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$31.07
Change+$0.07 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.16
Change+$0.52 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
HSUCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. HSUCX (71.2M). RGACX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: RGACX (0.08) vs HSUCX (0.00). HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: HSUCX (11 years) vs RGACX (23 years). HSUCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGACX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. RGACX (3.09). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.06 vs. HSUCX (13.01).
| HSUCX | RGACX | HSUCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 0.94 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 0.94 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.025 | -2.542 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2M | 284B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.09 | 3.09 | 326% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.91 | 32.79 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.01 | 42.06 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -84.42 | 58.28 | -145% |