Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HSUCX vs RGAHX
HSUCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts HSUCX vs RGAHX
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$31.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.99M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$85.18
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
HSUCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HSUCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HSUCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. HSUCX (63M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs HSUCX (0.00). HSUCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: HSUCX (12 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: RGAHX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.06 vs. HSUCX (-1.13). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 34.78 vs. HSUCX (-13.51).
| HSUCX | RGAHX | HSUCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.44 | 489% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.44 | 489% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.105 | 15.986 | -13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.13 | 7.06 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.12 | 63.22 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.51 | 34.78 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.72 | 89.07 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement