HTD | MDIV | HTD / MDIV | |
Gain YTD | 6.639 | -0.287 | -2,309% |
Net Assets | 874M | 446M | 196% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.75 | 261% |
Turnover | 21.00 | 73.00 | 29% |
Yield | 4.52 | 6.54 | 69% |
Fund Existence | 21 years | 13 years | - |
HTD | MDIV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 3 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago90% | 8 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 3 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago70% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HTD and KMI have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTD and KMI's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDIV has been closely correlated with LADR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDIV jumps, then LADR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MDIV | 100% | +0.10% | ||
LADR - MDIV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
BXP - MDIV | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
USB - MDIV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
KEY - MDIV | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
STWD - MDIV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
More |