HTD | MDIV | HTD / MDIV | |
Gain YTD | 14.718 | 3.332 | 442% |
Net Assets | 910M | 434M | 210% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.75 | 261% |
Turnover | 21.00 | 73.00 | 29% |
Yield | 4.73 | 6.64 | 71% |
Fund Existence | 21 years | 13 years | - |
HTD | MDIV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 4 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 6 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago70% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HTD and KMI have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTD and KMI's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDIV has been closely correlated with LADR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MDIV jumps, then LADR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MDIV | 100% | +0.16% | ||
LADR - MDIV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
MAIN - MDIV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
BXP - MDIV | 72% Closely correlated | +1.50% | ||
USB - MDIV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
KEY - MDIV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More |