Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HTSCX vs SSGSX
HTSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HTSCX vs SSGSX
Hartford Small Cap Value C
Price$9.78
Change-$0.04 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.95M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.14
Change-$0.11 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
HTSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HTSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTSCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. HTSCX (174M). HTSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HTSCX (0.73) vs SSGSX (0.50). HTSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HTSCX (21 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HTSCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HTSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HTSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: HTSCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). HTSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.11 vs. SSGSX (-5.72). HTSCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.57 vs. SSGSX (14.39).
| HTSCX | SSGSX | HTSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.26 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.26 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.008 | -4.695 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 174M | 5.38B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.50 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.11 | -5.72 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.92 | -7.36 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.57 | 14.39 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.45 | 14.31 | -108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers