Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HTSCX vs SSGSX
HTSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts HTSCX vs SSGSX
Hartford Small Cap Value C
Price$10.56
Change-$0.07 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.11M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
HTSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HTSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. HTSCX (185M). HTSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: HTSCX (0.73) vs SSGSX (0.50). HTSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: HTSCX (21 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). HTSCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). HTSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). HTSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: HTSCX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). HTSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.05 vs. SSGSX (-3.93). HTSCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.29 vs. SSGSX (20.68).
| HTSCX | SSGSX | HTSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.26 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.14 | 1.26 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.663 | 1.852 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 185M | 5.63B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.50 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.05 | -3.93 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.92 | -0.85 | -1,524% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.29 | 20.68 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.63 | 24.03 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers