It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HTSUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHCUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PHCUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
HTSUF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PHCUF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.09%.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
HTSUF | PHCUF | HTSUF / PHCUF | |
Capitalization | 2.51B | 129M | 1,944% |
EBITDA | 19.4B | -2.74M | -706,997% |
Gain YTD | -27.768 | -26.557 | 105% |
P/E Ratio | 25.19 | 500.00 | 5% |
Revenue | 134B | 418M | 32,057% |
Total Cash | 137B | 246M | 55,691% |
Total Debt | 1.2B | 6.25M | 19,232% |
HTSUF | PHCUF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HTSUF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHCUF (89). This means that HTSUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.
HTSUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHCUF (100). This means that HTSUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.
HTSUF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as PHCUF (86). This means that HTSUF’s stock grew similarly to PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.
PHCUF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as HTSUF (72). This means that PHCUF’s stock grew similarly to HTSUF’s over the last 12 months.
HTSUF's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as PHCUF (100). This means that HTSUF’s stock grew similarly to PHCUF’s over the last 12 months.
HTSUF | PHCUF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago22% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago41% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago38% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago10% | 2 days ago30% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago12% | 2 days ago31% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago20% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MDVSX | 9.78 | N/A | N/A |
MassMutual Diversified Value R5 | |||
APLIX | 11.63 | -0.02 | -0.17% |
Cavanal Hill Hedged Income Investor | |||
CSIRX | 26.97 | -0.08 | -0.30% |
Columbia Acorn International Sel Inst3 | |||
NBMTX | 17.96 | -0.22 | -1.21% |
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Tr | |||
MEMIX | 35.15 | -1.13 | -3.11% |
MFS Emerging Markets Equity I |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HTSUF and ORGO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTSUF and ORGO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTSUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HTSUF | 100% | N/A | ||
ORGO - HTSUF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
PHCUF - HTSUF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CHBRF - HTSUF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HYPMY - HTSUF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
IPSEY - HTSUF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PHCUF and HTSUF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PHCUF and HTSUF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHCUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PHCUF | 100% | N/A | ||
HTSUF - PHCUF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PCLOF - PHCUF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.70% | ||
SHWZ - PHCUF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PCYN - PHCUF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
RAFA - PHCUF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
More |