HTUS | LBAY | HTUS / LBAY | |
Gain YTD | 30.098 | -1.479 | -2,035% |
Net Assets | 74.6M | 35.9M | 208% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 46.00 | 44.00 | 105% |
Yield | 1.06 | 3.35 | 32% |
Fund Existence | 9 years | 4 years | - |
HTUS | LBAY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago90% | 24 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago77% | 2 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago62% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LBAY and GEHC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBAY and GEHC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LBAY | 100% | -0.62% | ||
GEHC - LBAY | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
QSR - LBAY | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
ZIMV - LBAY | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.60% | ||
WBA - LBAY | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
NEP - LBAY | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
More |