HTWSF
Price
$1.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
LBTYK
Price
$12.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.41B
30 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HTWSF vs LBTYK

Header iconHTWSF vs LBTYK Comparison
Open Charts HTWSF vs LBTYKBanner chart's image
Helios Towers
Price$1.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$325K
Capitalization1.22B
Liberty Global
Price$12.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$781.06K
Capitalization6.41B
HTWSF vs LBTYK Comparison Chart
Loading...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LBTYK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTWSF vs. LBTYK commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTWSF is a Hold and LBTYK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HTWSF: $1.13 vs. LBTYK: $12.01)
Brand notoriety: HTWSF and LBTYK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTWSF: 717% vs. LBTYK: 43%
Market capitalization -- HTWSF: $1.22B vs. LBTYK: $6.41B
HTWSF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $1.22B. LBTYK’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $6.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTWSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLBTYK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HTWSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LBTYK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBTYK is a better buy in the long-term than HTWSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTWSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBTYK’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTWSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LBTYK’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTWSF is a better buy in the short-term than LBTYK.

Price Growth

HTWSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +3.24% price change this week, while LBTYK (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +10.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

LBTYK is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+10.76% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBTYK($6.41B) has a higher market cap than HTWSF($1.22B). HTWSF YTD gains are higher at: 5.607 vs. LBTYK (-8.600). HTWSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 113M vs. LBTYK (-501.1M). LBTYK has more cash in the bank: 3.41B vs. HTWSF (389M). HTWSF has less debt than LBTYK: HTWSF (1.47B) vs LBTYK (17.4B). LBTYK has higher revenues than HTWSF: LBTYK (7.49B) vs HTWSF (502M).
HTWSFLBTYKHTWSF / LBTYK
Capitalization1.22B6.41B19%
EBITDA113M-501.1M-23%
Gain YTD5.607-8.600-65%
P/E RatioN/A15.13-
Revenue502M7.49B7%
Total Cash389M3.41B11%
Total Debt1.47B17.4B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBTYK: Fundamental Ratings
LBTYK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTWSFLBTYK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LBTYK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVORX22.300.21
+0.95%
Invesco Value Opportunities R
AILLX26.210.22
+0.85%
Aristotle Core Equity I-2
ABIEX8.510.04
+0.47%
AB Emerging Markets Multi-Asset I
FISVX26.040.10
+0.39%
Fidelity Small Cap Value Index
REPSX38.21-0.03
-0.08%
ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Svc

HTWSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and LBTYA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and LBTYA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTWSF
1D Price
Change %
HTWSF100%
-0.44%
LBTYA - HTWSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFTBY - HTWSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
LBTYK - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKM - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
VDMCY - HTWSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
More

LBTYK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYK has been closely correlated with LBTYA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYK jumps, then LBTYA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBTYK
1D Price
Change %
LBTYK100%
N/A
LBTYA - LBTYK
98%
Closely correlated
N/A
S - LBTYK
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
RCI - LBTYK
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
TLGPY - LBTYK
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
TLSNY - LBTYK
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More