HTWSF
Price
$1.65
Change
-$0.02 (-1.20%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.79B
LBTYK
Price
$11.63
Change
+$0.11 (+0.95%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.96B
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HTWSF vs LBTYK

Header iconHTWSF vs LBTYK Comparison
Open Charts HTWSF vs LBTYKBanner chart's image
Helios Towers
Price$1.65
Change-$0.02 (-1.20%)
Volume$1.72K
Capitalization1.79B
Liberty Global
Price$11.63
Change+$0.11 (+0.95%)
Volume$1.32M
Capitalization3.96B
HTWSF vs LBTYK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LBTYK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HTWSF vs. LBTYK commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HTWSF is a StrongBuy and LBTYK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (HTWSF: $1.64 vs. LBTYK: $11.63)
Brand notoriety: HTWSF and LBTYK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HTWSF: 48% vs. LBTYK: 123%
Market capitalization -- HTWSF: $1.79B vs. LBTYK: $3.96B
HTWSF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.79B. LBTYK’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HTWSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLBTYK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HTWSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LBTYK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HTWSF and LBTYK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTWSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBTYK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HTWSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LBTYK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBTYK is a better buy in the short-term than HTWSF.

Price Growth

HTWSF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while LBTYK (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

LBTYK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBTYK($3.96B) has a higher market cap than HTWSF($1.79B). HTWSF has higher P/E ratio than LBTYK: HTWSF (21.64) vs LBTYK (2.06). HTWSF YTD gains are higher at: 53.738 vs. LBTYK (-11.492). HTWSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 487M vs. LBTYK (-1.84B). LBTYK has more cash in the bank: 3.15B vs. HTWSF (184M). HTWSF has less debt than LBTYK: HTWSF (1.95B) vs LBTYK (10.5B). LBTYK has higher revenues than HTWSF: LBTYK (4.63B) vs HTWSF (820M).
HTWSFLBTYKHTWSF / LBTYK
Capitalization1.79B3.96B45%
EBITDA487M-1.84B-27%
Gain YTD53.738-11.492-468%
P/E Ratio21.642.061,051%
Revenue820M4.63B18%
Total Cash184M3.15B6%
Total Debt1.95B10.5B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBTYK: Fundamental Ratings
LBTYK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HTWSFLBTYK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LBTYK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGIRX21.11N/A
N/A
Alger Mid Cap Growth Institutional R
FRBAX29.43N/A
N/A
JHancock Regional Bank A
JIISX83.92N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Sustainable Leaders I
QKACX50.88N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6
FIDZX38.13N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Cap App Z

HTWSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and LBTYA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and LBTYA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTWSF
1D Price
Change %
HTWSF100%
N/A
LBTYA - HTWSF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
SFTBY - HTWSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.46%
LBTYK - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
SKM - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
VDMCY - HTWSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
More

LBTYK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYK has been closely correlated with LBTYA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYK jumps, then LBTYA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBTYK
1D Price
Change %
LBTYK100%
+0.95%
LBTYA - LBTYK
96%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
CABO - LBTYK
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
S - LBTYK
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
LBTYB - LBTYK
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TLGPY - LBTYK
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
More