HUBC
Price
$0.81
Change
+$0.15 (+22.73%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.01M
LGZDF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
21.94M
Ad is loading...

HUBC vs LGZDF

Header iconHUBC vs LGZDF Comparison
Open Charts HUBC vs LGZDFBanner chart's image
Hub Cyber Security
Price$0.81
Change+$0.15 (+22.73%)
Volume$2.7M
Capitalization8.01M
Logizard
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization21.94M
HUBC vs LGZDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUBC vs. LGZDF commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUBC is a Hold and LGZDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HUBC: $0.81 vs. LGZDF: $8.65)
Brand notoriety: HUBC and LGZDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUBC: 130% vs. LGZDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- HUBC: $8.01M vs. LGZDF: $21.94M
HUBC [@Packaged Software] is valued at $8.01M. LGZDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $21.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUBC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLGZDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HUBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LGZDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LGZDF is a better buy in the long-term than HUBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HUBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

HUBC (@Packaged Software) experienced а +38.65% price change this week, while LGZDF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LGZDF($21.9M) has a higher market cap than HUBC($8.01M). HUBC YTD gains are higher at: 16.725 vs. LGZDF (0.000). LGZDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 327M vs. HUBC (-73.46M). LGZDF has higher revenues than HUBC: LGZDF (1.82B) vs HUBC (226M).
HUBCLGZDFHUBC / LGZDF
Capitalization8.01M21.9M37%
EBITDA-73.46M327M-22%
Gain YTD16.7250.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue226M1.82B12%
Total CashN/A1.22B-
Total DebtN/A1.63M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBCLGZDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACVF44.970.41
+0.93%
American Conservative Values ETF
NULV40.620.26
+0.64%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
LBAY24.360.10
+0.40%
Leatherback Long/Short Alt Yld ETF
JPRE47.190.06
+0.13%
JPMorgan Realty Income ETF
FCFY24.67N/A
N/A
First Trust S&P 500 Div Fr CA Flw ETF

HUBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBC has been loosely correlated with INTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBC jumps, then INTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBC
1D Price
Change %
HUBC100%
+22.66%
INTZ - HUBC
40%
Loosely correlated
-8.33%
REKR - HUBC
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.90%
LGZDF - HUBC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRIN - HUBC
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
KASHF - HUBC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LGZDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LGZDF and KSFTF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LGZDF and KSFTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGZDF
1D Price
Change %
LGZDF100%
N/A
KSFTF - LGZDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNDO - LGZDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
HUBC - LGZDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+22.66%
MRT - LGZDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
DIDIY - LGZDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
More