HUGPF
Price
$46.36
Change
+$2.44 (+5.56%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
IFABF
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.07 (-9.09%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
31.23M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HUGPF vs IFABF

Header iconHUGPF vs IFABF Comparison
Open Charts HUGPF vs IFABFBanner chart's image
Hugo Boss AG
Price$46.36
Change+$2.44 (+5.56%)
Volume$218
Capitalization5.59B
iFabric
Price$0.70
Change-$0.07 (-9.09%)
Volume$10.5K
Capitalization31.23M
HUGPF vs IFABF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HUGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HUGPF vs. IFABF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUGPF is a Buy and IFABF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HUGPF: $46.36 vs. IFABF: $0.70)
Brand notoriety: HUGPF and IFABF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HUGPF: 156% vs. IFABF: 403%
Market capitalization -- HUGPF: $5.59B vs. IFABF: $31.23M
HUGPF [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $5.59B. IFABF’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $31.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HUGPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIFABF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HUGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IFABF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUGPF is a better buy in the long-term than IFABF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUGPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFABF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HUGPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • IFABF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUGPF is a better buy in the short-term than IFABF.

Price Growth

HUGPF (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +5.57% price change this week, while IFABF (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -9.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (+4.20% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUGPF($5.59B) has a higher market cap than IFABF($31.2M). IFABF has higher P/E ratio than HUGPF: IFABF (97.48) vs HUGPF (21.01). HUGPF YTD gains are higher at: 6.160 vs. IFABF (-7.076). HUGPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 682M vs. IFABF (879K). HUGPF has more cash in the bank: 137M vs. IFABF (3.65M). IFABF has less debt than HUGPF: IFABF (1.14M) vs HUGPF (757M). HUGPF has higher revenues than IFABF: HUGPF (3.85B) vs IFABF (22.9M).
HUGPFIFABFHUGPF / IFABF
Capitalization5.59B31.2M17,923%
EBITDA682M879K77,588%
Gain YTD6.160-7.076-87%
P/E Ratio21.0197.4822%
Revenue3.85B22.9M16,799%
Total Cash137M3.65M3,758%
Total Debt757M1.14M66,229%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUGPF vs IFABF: Fundamental Ratings
HUGPF
IFABF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
461
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58100
SMR RATING
1..100
5482
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4898
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUGPF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFABF (78). This means that HUGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFABF’s over the last 12 months.

HUGPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFABF (100). This means that HUGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFABF’s over the last 12 months.

HUGPF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as IFABF (82). This means that HUGPF’s stock grew similarly to IFABF’s over the last 12 months.

HUGPF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as IFABF (61). This means that HUGPF’s stock grew similarly to IFABF’s over the last 12 months.

HUGPF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IFABF (98). This means that HUGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IFABF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUGPFIFABF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HUGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFABF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VDEVF35.66N/A
N/A
Van de Velde NV
OLGPF0.75N/A
N/A
Olam Group Ltd.
JFIL0.05N/A
N/A
Jubilant Flame International Ltd.
KRYAY109.31-1.29
-1.17%
Kerry Group plc
MEDXF2.27-0.03
-1.27%
Medexus Pharmaceuticals Inc

HUGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HUGPF and YUEIF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUGPF and YUEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUGPF
1D Price
Change %
HUGPF100%
N/A
YUEIF - HUGPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMRZF - HUGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNBYF - HUGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGXY - HUGPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXSBY - HUGPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IFABF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFABF and GXSBY have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFABF and GXSBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFABF
1D Price
Change %
IFABF100%
N/A
GXSBY - IFABF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNNMY - IFABF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
HUGPF - IFABF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGXY - IFABF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPNEY - IFABF
-7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More